<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Wheel failure</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Wheel failure</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:20:10 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>spytfyre on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8507</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>spytfyre</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8507@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;in Livingston they carefully position a new roundabout over each new pothole... won't have a pothole there again... mind you the confusion on sleepy drivers faces as they auto pilot to work and notice the overnight birth of a new baby roundabout turn to panic is somewhat amusing... &#34;whatthe..NYEEEAAAGHTHATWASN'TTHERELASTNIGHT!!?!?!?&#34;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Min on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8504</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Min</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8504@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;why the pixie population spiralled after trams were removed.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Makes sense. Though nowadays it seems likely that they will take advantage of the current situation by congregating along obsolete tram rails.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arellcat on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8500</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Arellcat</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8500@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Edinburgh's actually had a growing infestation of wheel eating pixies since about 1956.  Their olefactory organs are highly tuned to both vulcanized rubber and carbon dioxide, which is why holes in the road are mistakenly associated with heavy lorries and buses, and why the pixie population spiralled after trams were removed.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;However, the high energy output of professional cyclists forms CO2 microclimates which can attract small numbers of said pixies.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Min on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8499</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Min</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8499@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Nah, that's the lumpy globs of crumbly tarmac pixies..
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8461</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8461@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;wheel eating pixies&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Is that what councils say when people complain about potholes?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Min on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8455</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Min</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8455@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;In the big photo it looks as if the wheel is being sucked underground by tarmac dwelling, wheel eating pixies.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8453</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8453@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Aye...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Caption implies he was run into, which which suggests wheel wasn't really designed for 'extreme' use (i.e. anything other than straightforward time trialling with no-one else around!)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stepdoh on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8451</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stepdoh</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8451@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Nope, tis definitely a bent wheel...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://i45.tinypic.com/34hc1tu.jpg&#34;&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8450</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8450@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think you'll find that's a large pothole....
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stepdoh on "Wheel failure"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=943#post-8448</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stepdoh</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8448@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;In reference to the wheel failure sub-discussion of earlier. Ouch.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/cgi/gallerypicget.asp?pic=http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/photos/races10/sui10/sui10st04-sprint.jpg&#34;&#62;http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/cgi/gallerypicget.asp?pic=http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/photos/races10/sui10/sui10st04-sprint.jpg&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Just shows you how light/fragile the wheels a lot of these guys are rolling on. I guess it's high performance/high chance of major failure.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
