http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Topic: Unofficial traffic poll....teaser en Wed, 13 May 2026 03:42:01 +0000 http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-102822 Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:06:41 +0000 sallyhinch 102822@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>If the Scottish government ever release the census data we'd at least know what had happened to commuting rates area by area. From the blogs they seem to be out for England, Wales &amp; NI - Lord knows what they're doing with the Scottish figures </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-102816 Mon, 04 Mar 2013 22:17:42 +0000 SRD 102816@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>I can't believe how many bikes I see with childseats these days. Would love some proper data that woud tell me if there s really an increase in use or not. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-102797 Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:56:39 +0000 shuggiet 102797@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>No tease here! On the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slateford_Aqueduct">Slateford aqueduct</a> this morning there were 10 cyclists crossing at the same time today at about 8.30. A record count for me in 2 years of commuting this way.. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101247 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:38:42 +0000 chdot 101247@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>"17"</p> <p>So I was slightly overoptimistic. </p> <p>"However on a cheery note I can't help but think that it is an encouragingly high number for the middle of February"</p> <p>Agreed. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101244 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:34:57 +0000 stiltskin 101244@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Well: Time to put you all out of your collective misery. The answer is..............</p> <p>17. How dull</p> <p>However on a cheery note I can't help but think that it is an encouragingly high number for the middle of February. I know it was quite a nice day, but you don't just hop onto your bike mid-winter to commute to work on a whim.<br /> 0 pedestrians was a bit of a surprse. Maybe all the lumen wars have scared them off the path/ </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101235 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:01:53 +0000 fimm 101235@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>42? </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101225 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:30:24 +0000 BaseCut 101225@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>13? </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101126 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:19:49 +0000 Cyclingmollie 101126@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p><a href="http://youtu.be/sAz_UvnUeuU">Eleven</a>? </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101098 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:59:41 +0000 wingpig 101098@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>I saw more than thirty between Five Ways and Roseburn this morning. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101097 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:59:15 +0000 stiltskin 101097@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>^You fail to take account of the Wiggo effect. </p> <p>Although somewhat surprisingly that was actually the number of pedestrians. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101096 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:45:39 +0000 crowriver 101096@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>None at all? (Except yourself). </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101094 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:41:12 +0000 stiltskin 101094@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>^ I'm afraid Yorkshire got the Tour De France Grand Depart. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101093 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:39:10 +0000 shuggiet 101093@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>117 </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101092 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:29:23 +0000 SRD 101092@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Or a tagalong? </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101091 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:23:34 +0000 chdot 101091@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>I was allowing for precise timekeeping cutoff with a bike passing you. </p> <p>So 22 then. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101088 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:49:45 +0000 stiltskin 101088@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Nope.</p> <p>I'm going to help you all out by stating that no unicycles were spotted. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101087 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:47:05 +0000 chdot 101087@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>21 1/2 </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9533#post-101086 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:38:43 +0000 stiltskin 101086@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Well. I had five minutes to spare, so guess how many bikes I counted crossing the Roseburn Viaduct between 17:25 &amp; 17:30 tonight. G'wan have a guess. </p> <p>Answer tomorrow :-) </p>