<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:25:54 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>sallyhinch on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105184</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sallyhinch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105184@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Oh, and the lights should be interchangeable. The only difference is hub dynamo lights have a switch and bottle dynamo ones don't need them, but I use a light with a switch which is designed for a hub dynamo and it's fine
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105179</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105179@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;From a comment by David Hembrow on sallyhinch's blog: &#60;em&#62;I’ve had both hub and bottle dynamos, and the difference between them is one of those swings and roundabouts issues. Hubs are usually a little more efficient at night time when the lights are on, but they’re also heavier, more annoying to retrofit, and less efficient in the daytime when the lights are off. I do more riding in the day-time than the night-time, so I normally use bottle dynamos.&#60;/em&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>sallyhinch on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105178</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sallyhinch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105178@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I have a modern bottle dynamo - Nordlicht from Dutch Bike Bits. Initially I found it hard work, but that turned out to be because it wasn't properly adjusted - it needs to be running quite lightly against the wheel. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://cityexile.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/cancel-that-order-for-legs-of-steel/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://cityexile.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/cancel-that-order-for-legs-of-steel/&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;There's a sweet spot between rubbing too hard, and skipping out a little during wet rides, which can make for an interesting night ride. I second Crowriver on the mounting. As for drag, I recently rode for about 11 miles with the thing on in daylight without noticing but that was with the ice tyres, and all manner of junk in my panniers; my bike's not exactly optimised for speed.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I quite like the noise, it's nice to have something whirring away in the dark lighting your way along quiet country lanes.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105171</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105171@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Not ciggies, jays were 'biffs' or 'bifters'. I think it's Scouse rhyming slang: spliff/biff, hence bifter. Apparently it can also refer to a fat lady, so presumably bifter = fat spliff?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wingpig on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105165</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105165@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;em&#62;&#34;...whether I can use a hub dynamo light with a bottle dynamo...&#34;&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/blockquote&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Yes.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;em&#62;&#34;I understand Franklin Benjamin is on the $100 note, hence the slang.&#34;&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/blockquote&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thought so.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Would you happen to know why some of my associates in the late nineties referred to cigarettes as &#34;bifters&#34;?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Uberuce on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105158</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Uberuce</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105158@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Thankee Mr River, wise in the ways of the Force you are.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If anyone happens to know whether I can use a hub dynamo light with a bottle dynamo, that'd be handy. As far as I can tell, the only difference is that the bottle ones save money by not bothering with a switch, so I could anticipate a future upgrade to dynohub by getting that kind of light. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Veruca Salt. I only got Seether from them, which I liked. I understand Franklin Benjamin is on the $100 note, hence the slang.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105125</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105125@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Bottle dynamos do give flexibility. They are also noisier than hub dynamos when engaged, and can be draggy - but shouldn't be too much so if adjusted properly (which is a bit of an art).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The modern B&#38;amp;M or Nordlicht dynamos are pretty efficient. Also, of course, when disengaged there is no drag at all.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The only real issue I've had with the dynamos I've used so far has been the mounts. The various bolt-on clamps that fix to forks or rear stays are wont to come loose or crack with vibration. A fork such as the ones Thorn make, with a braze on especially for bottle dynamos, is the ideal solution. Otherwise the best engineered mount you can get: I think B&#38;amp;M make a good one.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wingpig on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105120</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 22:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105120@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think you need a Crowriver.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Is that why Veruca Salt did a song called &#34;Benjamin&#34; back in the early nineties, lamenting where their money had gone?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SRD on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105115</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 22:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SRD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105115@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I've ridden with 1990s vintage bottle dynamos, which I cannot imagine were any improvement on 1970s vintage.  But perhaps by modern, you mean 'of this century'.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Uberuce on "Are Modern Bottle Dynamos Still Rubbish?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=9735#post-105113</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 22:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Uberuce</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105113@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;My recent thought experiment has been to swap wee blue floofy's canti/V fork for a disc mounted one and then obtain a dynohub of 6-bolt 160mm rotor ilk. This would mean I had a wheel I could swap between the daily workhorse and the audaxy shiny distance bike, and only need to fettle the light from one t'other the night before any lengthy rides.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I can get the same interchangability from a bottle dynamo setup, and counting dem Benjamins, the disc option really fails. If you're not familiar with a middle-aged middle class man's knowledge of street lingo and don't know what 'dem Benjamins' means in this context, then I despair for you but will nonetheless say it means 'the money'.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've run around town quite happily on the iron horse with its amusingly draggy 1976 vintage bottle, but what I will tolerate on pub pootles and what I will tolerate for audax are different animals. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;However, if the 40% efficiency claimed by B&#38;amp;M's flagship bottle is to be believed, then I might be in business.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Has anyone used such a device?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
