CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

Do we need a coronavirus thread?

(5710 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. minus six
    Member

    @Yodhrin

    Also, the whole "experimental vaccine" thing is a real nonsense being churned around online by scared boomers or rabid Tea Party types in America, they're no more experimental than any vaccines, they went through the same trials and approvals

    i feel sorry for your lack of critical analysis

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. minus six
    Member

    @wingpig

    But which they can still transmit, either between themselves or via their parents and carers, until it reaches someone vulnerable, unvaccinatable, immune-compromised or otherwise susceptible to a life-threatening infection

    there's nothing new about this

    what is new, is the endless bullying for young people to take a novel experimental vaccine that is more likely to do them harm than help anyone else

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. minus six
    Member

    get the public to accept a pan-coronavirus vaccine counter-measure

    an injection of a synthetic recombinant chimeric protein developed from a computer simulation

    investors will follow where they see profit

    there is no liability for the manufacturers or the nhs

    good news for investors and their vax administrators

    this rodeo will not end with a third "booster" jab

    you're in this for life

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. chdot
    Admin

  5. Yodhrin
    Member

    @bax Come on then chiefo, educate us - don't just regurgitate the latest breaking crackpottery from Facebook, provide some actual evidence of your claims, demonstrate in a rational manner that there is something wrong with the process by which the vaccines were approved. Not vague innuendo. Not pub-bore "well it's just obvious innit" guff.

    Otherwise, the rational thing for anyone capable of critical analysis to do is reject what you're saying as the antivax concern-troll rubbish it very much appears to be.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. wingpig
    Member

    "...an injection of a synthetic recombinant chimeric protein developed from a computer simulation..."

    What big sciencey words you have. This forum is probably not the best place to try that, though. If you want to try and develop an entirely new field of manual protein folding using mud and sticks, no-ones stopping you, though a stick is arguably also a technological development. Might also be quite a long list of other things you'll want to avoid besides vaccines and other medicines if you're not keen on anything produced through genetic recombination.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. LaidBack
    Member

    WHO rarely make comments of this sort (from National)

    In unusually forthright comments from the WHO which usually refrains from remarking on the policies of individual member states, its Covid-19 technical lead

    Maria Van Kerkhove hit out at the scenes which saw fans crowded into the stands at the London stadium.

    "Am I supposed to be enjoying watching transmission happening in front of my eyes?" she tweeted in the late stages of the match which saw Italy defeat England.

    "The Covi-19 pandemic is not taking a break tonight ... #SARSCoV2 #DeltaVariant will take advantage of unvaccinated people, in crowded settings, unmasked, screaming/shouting/singing. Devastating."

    Dr David Nabarro from WHO said he was amazed how two neighbouring administrations on same island could not agree on face mask rules and other measures. This I took was aimed at Johnston. I can't find link. Closest was this. London Transport will follow transport in Scotland it seems with compulsory face covering now. Commuters in other parts of England can choose to do what suits them.

    “It’s necessary to be unequivocal on this particular challenge. What does urging caution mean? It’s important that everybody knows the best possible advice on how to prevent themselves being infected.

    “I accept that vaccination has changed the nature of the equation in the UK but quite honestly from any point of view it’s too early to be talking about massive relaxation or freedom when the outbreak curve is on such a sharp ascent.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. chdot
    Admin

  9. chdot
    Admin

  10. chdot
    Admin

    U-turn as Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak to self-isolate after criticism

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jul/18/boris-johnson-and-rishi-sunak-will-not-isolate-after-being-pinged-says-no-10

    Posted 2 years ago #
  11. minus six
    Member

    @Yodhrin

    don't just regurgitate the latest breaking crackpottery from Facebook, provide some actual evidence of your claims, demonstrate in a rational manner that there is something wrong with the process by which the vaccines were approved.

    These vaccines haven't been formally approved or licensed, there hasn't been time for that, the studies are incomplete til 2023.

    They are temporarily authorised for emergency use, a decision which was only allowed on the (now debatable) basis that no standard acceptable treatment is available.

    This emergency authorisation is temporarily extended every few months, last time was June 2021.

    for example

    Whilst an acceptable level of information has been received to provide assurance that appropriate standards of quality, safety and efficacy have been met for authorisation of specific batches for temporary supply under Regulation 174 of the Regulations, it should be noted that COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 remains under review as MHRA continues to receive data from the company as it becomes available. This will include, for example, long-term follow-up efficacy and safety data. Further information that is received by the MHRA will be reviewed as part of the ongoing assessment for this product.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/conditions-of-authorisation-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine

    But hey, you don't have to agree with me.

    Phone up your life insurance company if you have one, and ask them if you're covered.

    You're not.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  12. minus six
    Member

    Let me be clear

    They are visibly desperate to get all remaining cohorts on at least one shot of a covid vaccine, preferably two or more

    Yet there are few deaths and the variants are getting milder

    Why then? Because they do not want a control group

    If long term vaccine effects emerge, they do not want a significantly populated unvaxed control group

    This isn't even a debate, its just reality

    Posted 2 years ago #
  13. Stickman
    Member

    Phone up your life insurance company if you have one, and ask them if you're covered

    You're not.

    Absolutely untrue.

    https://twitter.com/scottishwidows/status/1412426267899596807?s=21

    Completely and utterly false.

    https://twitter.com/britishinsurers/status/1371493658688679941?s=21

    Posted 2 years ago #
  14. Frenchy
    Member

    They are visibly desperate to get all remaining cohorts on at least one shot of a covid vaccine, preferably two or more

    Yes. They want fewer people to die.

    What absolute [rule 2]s they are.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  15. Stickman
    Member

    There’s a need for a Rule 3: no sharing of false health stories and lies during a pandemic.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  16. acsimpson
    Member

    With several different vaccines available they have control groups for each vaccine.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  17. Morningsider
    Member

    I don't understand the claim that there is no risk for investors in vaccine producers or the NHS. If any one of these vaccines was found to have significant, widespread health impacts the producer would be wiped out and any investment in the company alongside it - as no-one could ever trust one of their products again.

    Those involved in the vaccine development would never be employed again, the politicians who championed it voted out, the entire medical regulatory system would have to be reformed, academic journals would fold and individual researchers and clinicians would have to live with the knowledge that they had knowingly participated in a scheme that maimed or even killed millions of people.

    As incentives go to avoid a cock-up along the chain of vaccine development, approval and roll-out I reckon that is pretty compelling.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  18. minus six
    Member

    @stickman

    both of your promotional tweets refer to "the covid-19 vaccine" as if there is only one, which is so very cute of them

    Posted 2 years ago #
  19. minus six
    Member

    @morningsider

    If any one of these vaccines was found to have significant, widespread health impacts

    you know they denied the thalidamide health impact on pregnant women for five years til anything was done

    sir, you are an intelligent entity, so i encourage you - nay, beseech you - to watch this in full

    youtube.com/watch?v=gsDlHprql-g

    @stickman

    There’s a need for a Rule 3: no sharing of false health stories and lies during a pandemic

    ok, i'm out of here

    good luck with your echo chamber

    Posted 2 years ago #
  20. Arellcat
    Moderator

    <Moderator hat on>

    I would suggest that debates relating to the integrity and efficacy of the Covid-19 vaccines are given the same healthy caution as debates about bike helmets.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  21. minus six
    Member

    that is indeed noteable, @arellcat

    last weekends widely circulated scare story about the 90 year old lady from belgium, infected with two variants, every mass media outlet had in its second stand-out paragraph that she was not vaccinated

    would it have been mentioned if she was vaccinated? no

    watch out for this - its the same editorial victim blaming we have seen so often over the years with cycle helmets in fatal incidents

    ok, i'm out

    Posted 2 years ago #
  22. Stickman
    Member

    “both of your promotional tweets refer to "the covid-19 vaccine" as if there is only one, which is very cute of them”

    You could listen to people (like me) who work in insurance, know about underwriting criteria and who know for an absolute fact that vaccination with any of the Covid vaccines is completely irrelevant to health insurance.

    ok, i'm out

    Good. **** off. People like you are ****ing dangerous.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  23. Stickman
    Member

    @Arellcat: nope, repeating proven lies about vaccines and other health measures isn’t just a “on the one hand, on the other” situation.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  24. minus six
    Member

    Good. **** off. People like you are ****ing dangerous

    i'll take that as a compliment, and you should reflect at length on how and why i got under your skin

    Posted 2 years ago #
  25. toomanybikes
    Member

    Got under their skin presumably you're parroting dangerous misinformation which threatens resumption of life as we once knew it. When did "critical thinking" become blindly absorbing conspiratorial nonsense from non-experts and ignoring active scientists (who are experts on the topic at hand and actually know what they're talking about)?

    Dismal.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  26. urchaidh
    Member

    Very much with Stickman and TMB on this one.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  27. chdot
    Admin

    I would love bax to be right IN THE SENSE THAT ’we’ are all too familiar with being outsiders/‘wrong’ when it comes to things like advocating better walk/cycle infrastructure and slower/less traffic because it’s actually for the benefit of far more people than us “selfish cyclists”.

    BUT

    While the whole ‘managing’ of the Covid crisis, particularly in the UK/Scotland is still, shall we say, ‘controversial’, the basic facts are largely agreed and deniers are increasingly on the fringe - as are Climate Change deniers, at last.

    Of course they could be right too.

    However in the context of CCE, arguing that case would be unwelcome.

    CCE suffered significantly from a relatively recent stooshie about the (then) hot Twitter topic surrounding gender/identity. Some people behaved badly and I got accused of not closing it down more quickly.

    I don’t want to have to do it again - EVER.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  28. chdot
    Admin

    The Freedom Day Gamble

    More or Less

    On the day the Government plans to drop the remaining Covid-19 restrictions, Tim Harford and the More or Less team try to work out how long cases will continue to rise and whether we can be sure the link with deaths and hospitalisations has been broken. Is this 'freedom day' or an unnecessary gamble with people’s lives?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000y49w

    Posted 2 years ago #
  29. chdot
    Admin

  30. LaidBack
    Member

    Was at first live music event for 18 months.
    Pashyanti at Summerhall. Solo guitar in Secret Courtyard.

    We got email to remind us to log in using app, and wear face mask during concert.
    Drinks were not meant to be taken in but revised to allow.
    In venue there were around 100 people spaced out well in a covered area. Bubbles of 2 or 4.
    People next to us were up from England and were not wearing face coverings anywhere in venue seated or standing. They were not alone.
    My wife sitting one seat away heard guy on phone telling his friends in South that 'some people in Scotland still thought they should wear face masks'.
    We also went by Sandy Bell's and the Scottish clientele were showing solidarity with the 'covid is over' viewpoint.
    Quite likely that the festival will result in a spike in figures. #safe bet

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin