@Yodhrin
don't just regurgitate the latest breaking crackpottery from Facebook, provide some actual evidence of your claims, demonstrate in a rational manner that there is something wrong with the process by which the vaccines were approved.
These vaccines haven't been formally approved or licensed, there hasn't been time for that, the studies are incomplete til 2023.
They are temporarily authorised for emergency use, a decision which was only allowed on the (now debatable) basis that no standard acceptable treatment is available.
This emergency authorisation is temporarily extended every few months, last time was June 2021.
for example
Whilst an acceptable level of information has been received to provide assurance that appropriate standards of quality, safety and efficacy have been met for authorisation of specific batches for temporary supply under Regulation 174 of the Regulations, it should be noted that COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 remains under review as MHRA continues to receive data from the company as it becomes available. This will include, for example, long-term follow-up efficacy and safety data. Further information that is received by the MHRA will be reviewed as part of the ongoing assessment for this product.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/conditions-of-authorisation-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine
But hey, you don't have to agree with me.
Phone up your life insurance company if you have one, and ask them if you're covered.
You're not.