So because some of the stories are baseless hyperbole, but some are reasoned and based on forecasts, that means I can't say the media are blowing things out of all proportion.
I mean, I guess I should have said, "Some of the media, generally the lower end outlets and local news resources, disproportionately exaggerate the upcoming storm warnings and predicted results".
"So those stories are baseless hyperbole "predicting" what might happen a month in the future that no one was expected to respond to."
So every single person who read those stories just tucked them away saying, 'Ach, it'll never happen'? Eeh, I wish that were true, because if it were then the people who read them also wouldn't believe the UK was becoming an Islamic state and that Poles were taking over the universe. But they do. Because people (some people, lest I'm conflating all individuals in the country) do actually believe these stories.
And my original point was simply that pre-event coverage is OTT to the point that the reality never seems to match it. You pointed out this was the 'role' of the media, but on the basis of above presumably not of the BBC (which you didn't split out, thereby conflating the BBC into the media whose role it is to over-state).
Erm.
Just re-read. "...every single bit of the media..." Ah. Mea culpa.
Damn. That was a particularly fine high horse I was on....