CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

Meadows-Innocent consultation (and subsequent building & use)

(485 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

  2. SRD
    Moderator

  3. Coxy
    Member

  4. Murun Buchstansangur
    Member

    @Coxy

    GSV shows a van parked plonk in the middle of the 'protected route' :rollseyes:

    https://goo.gl/maps/zv9e3HwfUt32

    Posted 8 years ago #
  5. rbrtwtmn
    Member

    I'm a big fan of the way that Amsterdam (and presumably many other cities) use continuous pavement (plus cycle lane) to give proper priority to those walking and cycling. Given this I wondered what might be going wrong at this junction. I'd love to know more from locals - but here's an interesting observation. Look at Google Streetview showing this junction from the perspective of someone driving out from the side road:
    https://goo.gl/maps/osgFKrg1cMk
    Also take note that this seems to be one of those very short out of context bits of infrastructure, and that it's two way (here's what it looks like just down the street: https://goo.gl/maps/Knwwzeu3QNt )

    Now look at some equivalent junctions in Amsterdam:
    https://goo.gl/maps/LY3vHASMm1P2
    https://goo.gl/maps/JHD59hJVnp32
    https://goo.gl/maps/fNtcMV4aBSL2
    (Do your own research - there are hundreds to choose from).

    What do you think the differences are? I can see a few that seem key - the top two being that the lack of the give way symbol, and the really clear wide pavement, are really obvious in comparison to the Leicester example.

    Thoughts and observations on this welcome.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  6. neddie
    Member

    The pavement has a 45 degree taper where the road meets the cycleway in the Amsterdam cases. This states, "the road is coming to an end, get ready to stop."

    In the Leicester example, the parallel kerb and double yellows right up to the cycleway state, "this is definitely a road for moving along, oh wait..." and bang you're on top of the cycleway.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  7. cc
    Member

    The lights were dark this morning at Clerk Street. They may have been bust for a while because when I warned a guy coming the other direction about it he replied "yeah I know".

    In other news the bumpy path on Hope Park Crescent was resurfaced a week or so ago.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  8. cc
    Member

    Apparently the lights are deliberately off, maybe until tomorrow, for maintenance.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  9. chdot
    Admin

    "

    Dear all

    The Gifford Park Murals

    Many of you will have seen the murals on the walls of the pedestrian corridor at the east end of Gifford Park (near the former Odeon cinema in Clerk Street). Please see attached photographs which show the section of the street before and after. The murals reflect local businesses and characters.

    We are delighted to announce that the Southside Association has been shortlisted to compete as a finalist in the Celebrating Communities category of the Scottish Charities Awards 2016 (organised by the SCVO – the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations). This is what we have written for the SCVO about our project:

    The idea of painting murals on dirty, graffiti covered walls of a pedestrian thoroughfare full of bins and rubbish seemed unlikely to catch on but there was such enthusiasm that we persisted. Thanks to a plan from the City’s cycle team to upgrade the cycle route we were able to make a transformation. Painting these murals drew together businesses, residents, students, tourists, - the whole community. It has been an amazing journey for us. Please look at our Facebook page to get the whole story (Gifford Park Mural). If it makes you smile too then please give us your vote.

    The Association is indebted to Hilary McDowell who started the whole project, and who battled to see it to completion; to the artist Kate George for her wonderful work; and to the University of Edinburgh for producing the postcards above which show the completed mural.

    We would be very pleased if you would consider voting for us.

    Here is the link - http://www.scvo.org.uk/charity-awards/the-southside-association/

    We would also be grateful if you would consider forwarding this to colleagues and friends and family.

    Thank you,

    Colin

    Colin Christison
    Chair/Secretary
    The Southside Association
    117 Nicolson Street
    Edinburgh
    EH8 9ER

    http://www.southsideassociation.co.uk

    "

    Posted 8 years ago #
  10. LaidBack
    Member

    New paths to Sciennes.

    Yes that is Victor Hugos in background and this cycle route is wide and smooth. Toucan at Melville Drive. Well done CEC.

    New paths to Sciennes by LaidBackBikes, on Flickr

    New paths to Sciennes by LaidBackBikes, on Flickr

    Posted 8 years ago #
  11. chdot
    Admin

    Is it finished?

    Wasn't a couple of days ago.

    Interesting details where paths cross by tennis court.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  12. LaidBack
    Member

    They were still sorting markings and had blocked path at Burroughloch. This made me turn left and use this new route. What a nice surprise.

    Actually a very good route to get over to Marchmont.
    No markings at Toucan at Melville Drive yet. Think they may mark the path that runs parallel to Melville Dr on South Side towards Bruntsfield?
    Ramp goes up to Victor Hugo too.

    So we are now getting some routes that I wasn't expecting. Good for school run to Crags!

    Posted 8 years ago #
  13. Nelly
    Member

    I theory it gives a great offroad route from Sciennes PS to Arthurs Seat and beyond.

    The (not so) funny part of that ride is crossing Melville Terrace at Victor Hugo, which should be - at the very least - a zebra crossing.

    We sit there on a Saturday during sons tennis and its a miracle no child has been knocked down.

    Do agree with @laidback though, the new tarmac is very good.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  14. mgj
    Member

    Are we really celebrating the extension of tarmacking over of green space to cut a corner? Seems to be solving the wrong problem.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  15. wingpig
    Member

    @mgj There was an existing route - it's been widened and smoothed.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  16. Morningsider
    Member

    I cycle through the Meadows every day. The improvements to the paths have been great. However, this is starting to get a bit silly - this path will have cost a fair bit of cash and it could probably have been better spent somewhere with no cycle infrastructure.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  17. SRD
    Moderator

    they've also done a lot of work (including a lot of vehicles on paths/grass) on the other diagonal path - the one that comes out near Chalmers st.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  18. crowriver
    Member

    @Morningsider, I think that's what is referred to in the hackneyed phrase "low hanging fruit".

    Widening a path in the Meadows is (almost literally) child's play compared to threatening illegal parking in loading bays at Roseburn/George Street/Leith Walk/any other example you care to mention that's not the Meadows.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  19. acsimpson
    Member

    A cycle path the length of Maybury Road may be slightly trickier than one across the Meadows but similarly should be simple for the council compared to those in your list.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  20. chdot
    Admin

    Posted 8 years ago #
  21. Rob
    Member

    Nice that they've incorporated a BMX route into the design.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  22. ih
    Member

    @Erob " ..BMX route .."

    Are you referring to the non-standard sign for a bike, or the fact that the route veers off, for no apparent reason, towards an obstacle?

    Posted 8 years ago #
  23. Morningsider
    Member

    Cobbles, tactiles, high friction surfacing and a big offset. Was there some sort of bet as to how much they could spend on this.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  24. Klaxon
    Member

    Dare say the veering is to improve the sight line and slightly reduce speed at the blind corner of the tennis court.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  25. chdot
    Admin

    "Dare say the veering is to improve the sight line and slightly reduce speed at the blind corner of the tennis court."

    Yes, and a speed reduction nudge.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  26. jdanielp
    Member

    Interesting - are the tactiles facing the correct directions? Good to have the work on the diagonal path on the other side of MMW confirmed; I'd noticed that it looked suddenly rather neater than it had whilst passing by on Jawbone Walk the other day.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  27. Morningsider
    Member

    Yes, but why not just paint SLOW or put in some give way lines. The cobbles and offset will have added thousands to the cost of the path for no appreciable benefit. Literally thousands of pedestrians and cyclists interact on he Meadows paths every day without incident. It simply isn't necessary.

    I appreciate the effort and am always happy to see new cycle infrastructure. However, budgets are limited and I would rather see more infrastructure - rather than gold plating of a few schemes.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  28. gembo
    Member

    Probably to do with the time of year? Budget needing used up? Looks nice. Why grumble? It is not as if it is a 3 mile long 3-4 metre wide almost totally segregated cycle lane. Just. Wee path going across the grass to Victor hugos

    Posted 8 years ago #
  29. Rob
    Member

    @ih the dirt track and jump to the right of the main path :)

    Posted 8 years ago #
  30. ih
    Member

    The Rankeillor St surface is an absolute mess. I'd like to see a resurface of the whole road but with a 2-way on-road cycle lane (the red chip variety) to join up in a straight line the lead-in paths at each end. Parking could stay the same, and given it's a cul-de-sac one lane should be enough for access. Any cars needing to pass each other could briefly encroach on the cycle lane. The additional cost over a resurface would be minimal. Is that legal? It's not unlike the contra-flow lane on a one way street.

    Posted 8 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin