CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

Meadows-Innocent consultation (and subsequent building & use)

(485 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. Roibeard
    Member

    @Dave - I think the initial consultations are comparable, except we're seeing these plans now improved based on the consultation. One might hope that the KB plans will be similarly improved by the consultation!

    I'm hoping that if one of these appear on the ground, and demonstrably work (maybe George Street), that the next will be braver/better and a virtuous cycle begins.

    I may be disappointed...

    Robert

    Posted 10 years ago #
  2. neddie
    Member

    Hardly anyone seems to be passing comment on this.

    Could it be that CEC have actually created something that's 'good enough'?

    Or is everyone still asleep after half term hols?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  3. SRD
    Moderator

    I thought these ones were going ahead? Had heard there'd been no objections.

    Am I just confused?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  4. wingpig
    Member

    Hardly anyone seems to be passing comment on this."

    Haven't had time to stare at them in detail on a large screen yet. I hope I've kept the originals somewhere.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  5. fimm
    Member

    Its perhaps not obvious that there's something new to comment on?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

    Work started?

    Posted 9 years ago #
  7. chdot
    Admin

    "

    The first phase of a £1.25 million scheme to link the Innocent Path cycleway to the Union Canal towpath via the Meadows is scheduled to get under way from Monday 9 March 2015.

    The project, which is due to last approximately 12 weeks, will include fully segregated sections of cycleway, as well as new cyclist / pedestrian crossings.

    "

    http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/news/article/1785/improving_cycle_links_between_the_meadows_and_the_innocent_path

    Posted 9 years ago #
  8. cb
    Member

    " last approximately 12 weeks"

    About eight weeks too late to assist with 'getting back' from this year's POP. Oh well, next year!

    Posted 9 years ago #
  9. jdanielp
    Member

    Maybe they'll finish it substantially ahead of schedule?!

    Posted 9 years ago #
  10. Arellcat
    Moderator

    Had a look at the works on Hope Park Crescent, where they've laid the kerbstones for the sharp turn towards the crossing leading to NMW. It's going to be a really quite sharp turn for tandemistas and trailerers.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  11. LaidBack
    Member

    Here's how it's progressing at Rankeillor St. Looks tight and suspect some people (faster cyclists?) will by-pass going east to avoid other oncoming cyclists at turn. This happens quite a bit at other junctions. The corner section can only 'hold' so many bikes anyway. Should it have been 'better' / more direct? Comments were made to even get to this stage so not sure how much it would have been changed. For less experienced users that are used to pavement riding this should work.


    New NCN1 path at Rankeillor St by LaidBackBikes, on Flickr


    New NCN1 path at Rankeillor St by LaidBackBikes, on Flickr

    Posted 9 years ago #
  12. SRD
    Moderator

    "For family groups that are used to pavement riding this might be ok."

    yup. this is who it is designed for.

    It was a big push to get this. the push for commuter-usable cycle infra is going to be bigger and harder. that is why we are riding to Holyrood on Saturday.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  13. LaidBack
    Member

    Agree - just changed wording to say 'less experienced'. I'm thinking of mum or dad with a four year old moving along at around 5 or 6 mph. Up till now they would have got off at busier junctions or cycle along the pavement.
    It is a bit of a two tier approach and easy to pick holes but the fact it is happening at all is a good sign.
    Those most able to get out into the road may dismiss these... but a several times a year family picnicker to Portobello might feel that there is some encouragement for them to cycle more.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  14. chdot
    Admin

    "Agree - just changed wording to say 'less experienced'."

    I think CEC needs to be much clearer (to the general public) about the purpose/scope of the Family Network.

    It has to be made VERY clear (especially to 'motorists') that 'cyclists' don't have to use the routes/segregated/shared use bits.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  15. LaidBack
    Member

    Also agree.

    Best/worst example of this is Holyrood Park. Voted (by many) as one of the most hostile cycling environments.

    We know that once this route is built then if we decide not to use parts of it we will get annoyance from the 'roads are for cars' brigade.
    At least this one actually has a cycleway leading to it - unlike the word crossing at Crosscauseway near the Crags

    Posted 9 years ago #
  16. chdot
    Admin

    "

    A major cycling milestone has been reached as construction of the first continental-style segregated bike path nears completion.

    "

    http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/landmark-cycle-route-almost-finished-1-3762307

    Posted 9 years ago #
  17. Nelly
    Member

    The EEN comments section is - again - truly astonishing.

    The amount of obvious trolling (road tax, pavement cycling) would be hilarious, were it not that some people might take it seriously.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  18. fimm
    Member

    Boyfriend of Fimm took some photos of this today. There are actual proper cycle paths (on the straight bits of the road, of course, I don't know about the junctions). I was quite surprised.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  19. chdot
    Admin

    "

    SRD (@SRDorman)
    10/05/2015 20:55
    Here are those amazing cycle paths. Pics by @KarlZeiner @LAHinds @adamrmcvey @SpokesLothian @CyclingEdin

    http://pic.twitter.com/13lWarPWfJ

    "

    Posted 9 years ago #
  20. fimm
    Member

    Just to put the dampners on this very slightly, I assume that they will be two-way? (Still, there is an impressive (for Britain) amount of space there.)

    Posted 9 years ago #
  21. SRD
    Moderator

    yes, they are bi-directional, which is why we were so worried about the width in the design.

    they're by no means 'dutch-standard' but a serious improvement on what was there.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  22. fimm
    Member

    Oh, absolutely (not that I know what was there). I'll have to go and explore once it is all finished!

    Posted 9 years ago #
  23. Funnily enough I was in Glasgow this weekend, and while it leaves a lot to be desired bike wise, they do have their bike hire scheme up and running, the path along the Clyde looks rather good, and the hotel I was staying on was on a street where this looked like it had been in place a while.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  24. SRD
    Moderator

    @wc did you see any bikes?

    Posted 9 years ago #
  25. 4 or 5, but I was there midday on a Saturday and it's very business district - may be more weekdays. Has its own lights and everything.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  26. neddie
    Member

  27. SRD
    Moderator

    pics need to be 'medium' now to post properly (on flickr anyway).

    I cycled a bit of this yesterday - very cool.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  28. neddie
    Member

    Arrrgh

    Stupid bbcode.

    Why won't it resize imgur images?

    Could we please have an image posting guide, chdot?

    Posted 9 years ago #
  29. SRD
    Moderator

    the resize thing got turned off because of people not being able to load some threads

    (i'm sure there's a proper technical explanation....)

    Posted 9 years ago #
  30. chdot
    Admin

    I thought someone had posted a pic of this ponding already, but maybe it was just on Twitter.

    Posted 9 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin