A lot of non means tested discounting, government employees, but also over 55 and if you have the right GP another discount. (of course to have the right GP may be related to living in better area).
I suppose like the bus pass baby boomers a bigger group politically more likely to vote. The age discrimination is possibly unfair as can get well of retired teachers on 25k getting free membership at Edinburgh leisure or get lawyers etc that can afford their own membership. I used to like going to the tennis centre gym, seemed a lot of reasonably of people that did not pay. Of course this is not a representative sample but did feel a big of mug paying full price when people turned up in 40k Audis pay nothing or next nothing.
Although it would seem reasonable to have subsidies children’s activities, but much like the tram where get lawyers on large income stepping on at shandwick place using a free ride card for 60 years old, yet 5 year olds are expected to pay irrespective of income government discount on political rather than need or income basis so am guessing children actives are still chargeable.
Excite gym seem better prices and also more what you would expect council to be providing an affordable service nothing glamorous still a tad more pricey than could hope for.
The best state subsidized gym I found was Herriot Watt cheap prices. As the university has relationships with community policy appears a nice “socialist utopia” for the public,. However tend to remember when at university for students a lot of falseness, universities focus on problems people don’t have, frivolous concerns, while will aggressively discriminate and cancel funding if central government etc gives the “right nod or wink” or whatever the “agent” of the central governments “whim” decides, irrespective of the law, university breach equality act if central government agent chooses (not just meaning the "Stasi" that hang around universities), far from the utopia or place of merit they present more a branch of the “bad side" (to be silly), of the state, in my time in the 90s, the government had a complete monopoly on under graduate funding crowed out the charity etc private borrowing, so if you got targeted by the state to have funding cut, which may be correlated with the more “free thinking” type , then was very little source of funding. A kind of in built adverse selection at university the states approval, is not an intellectual endorsement.
I do enjoy going down to the Watt using the faculties for almost nothing cycling around the place the gym the cafes etc although think it may be very much a business these days with non EU fees.
I am slightly wary of edinburgh lesuire type spending, as tends to be everyone that pays for them with a few narrow interests groups benefiting, like edinburgh lesure a tax on the worse of to pay for the benefit of better of or the trams a tax on everyone to pay for some narrow interests groups with cushy job at transport edinburgh or to pay contractors etc.
Unlike say cycling infrasture that is "non discriminatory" the (to be silly, although is something in may be) government have not figured out a way yet to charge poorer/ diverse/disabled or people that they disagree with, more to use the cycle paths yet as they may do with other services.