CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

Roseburn to Leith consultation begins (and the debate continues!) CCWEL

(5533 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. Frenchy
    Member

    Looking at the preliminary design for the Roseburn section: http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/downloads/file/8648/ccwel_final_preliminary_design_-_roseburn_section

    I see it says "Connection to Roseburn Path subject to separate study". Any ideas when/where/if that separate study was/is being/will be done?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  2. gembo
    Member

    Roseburn Path? Is that left at the bus stop, up Roseburn Cliff then down the bike chute? Or further on left after the bridge up West Coates, avoiding the steep access and on to the good access to the higher Roseburn path or is it THe spur from the latter bridge all the way back to Gorgie that is also proposed as a path? (when is that happenign?) Or is it something entirely different?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  3. Frenchy
    Member

    Sorry, should have been clear. I'm meaning access from Russell Road to the NEPN. The prelim designs suggest that there will be a study on how to best connect Roseburn Street to the Roseburn Path via Russell Road.

    Make any sense now?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  4. Stickman
    Member

    @gembo: the bit Frenchy is talking about is how to get from Roseburn junction round to the zigzags on Russell Road.

    A potential link was mentioned in one of the consultation reports but no details.

    EDIT: Found it: page 42 of this: http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/downloads/file/8062/you_said_we_did

    "11.2 It is likely that the Council’s current feasibility study of a cycle route link between Roseburn and Murieston will use the wide pavement referred to, which was originally constructed to facilitate future conversion to pedestrian/cycle use"

    Another part of the mythical Roseburn-Canal project.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  5. ih
    Member

    An ideal route from Roseburn to the NEPN would take the existing diagonal track that goes up the bank where the two new advertising displays are, and along the flat area at the top to join the NEPN in a very elegant way. It would completely remove the need to go along Russell Road. Is there any reason (ownership?) why this shouldn't be implemented?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  6. Frenchy
    Member

    To clarify, I'm particularly interested in this because it could be an opportunity to get a traffic island installed on Russell Road to prevent southbound drivers cutting the corner right by the zigzags.

    @ih's plan sounds great, too, though.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  7. gembo
    Member

    @ih, yes that is more elegant than just going under the bridge then up wester coates then doubling back

    @frenchy, stickman - yes russell road bad. The other route down from gorgie on unused railway should also connect up and as has been said, Russell Road could be avoided

    Posted 6 years ago #
  8. Stickman
    Member

    Is there any reason (ownership?) why this shouldn't be implemented?

    NIMBYs. The answer is usually NIMBYs.

    Is that path steeper than the zig-zags?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  9. ih
    Member

    No steeper than the zigzags imo, certainly than at the hairpins. I went up there once before the displays were installed - no problems.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  10. Frenchy
    Member

    The other route down from gorgie on unused railway

    Whereabout?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  11. LivM
    Member

    @Frenchy this one I guess: http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15762
    Although a down and up (under railway) or a new bridge over railway will be needed.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  12. Frenchy
    Member

    @LivD - thanks, must be that.

    I'm told that a public consultation on joining the East-West route to Roseburn Path is likely to happen this year.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  13. Stickman
    Member

    @Frenchy - I'm now very confused: joining where? Is the access at Wester Coates Terrace not sufficient, or are you talking about a route along Russel Road?

    Another consultation. Sigh.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  14. Frenchy
    Member

    Yes, Russell Road.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  15. Stickman
    Member

    Thanks. That makes sense if/when the link to the canal is built.

    I imagine it will involve loss of parking, so expect OUTRAGE

    Posted 6 years ago #
  16. Frenchy
    Member

    You're optimistic, I was imagining it won't involve loss of parking ;)

    Most of the east pavement on Russell Road is, or was at one point, shared use. Most, but not all, of the signs saying so have disappeared, or never existed. Fixing that, and sticking a traffic island in at the corner beside the zigzags would do a lot of good.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  17. Stickman
    Member

    Also making continuous pathways over the entrances to the Maltings.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  18. cb
    Member

    The pavement is quite narrow until just after the first Maltings entrance so there probably would need to be a loss of parking.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  19. chdot
    Admin

    That whole 'route' is a monument to piecemeal planning.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  20. Stickman
    Member

    Best solution is for Russell Road to be closed to through traffic. That isn't going to happen.

    As cb said, it's very narrow at the north end. Looking at Streetview it would need to lose about 10 spaces (OUTRAGE) to widen it to the same width as further south, and also move lampposts.

    Some bodge involving changing the pavement on the west side to a cycle lane could be possible, but I think the building at the corner is being converted to student accommodation so that won't work.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  21. chdot
    Admin

    "Best solution is for Russell Road to be closed to through traffic. That isn't going to happen."

    Yes. But.

    It's happened twice in recent times for bridge works.

    The world didn't end.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  22. Stickman
    Member

    Is parking on that stretch of Russell Road for permit holders ?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  23. cb
    Member

    From Streetview (May 2016) there is Loading Only (about three cars worth), then City Car Club (two cars) then free parking (two cars) then the Maltings entrance then more free parking (two cars).

    Posted 6 years ago #
  24. Stickman
    Member

    Thanks. At Corstorphine CC Frank Ross said the Roseburn locals were keen on residents parking as currently the area is full of commuters dumping their cars (similar issue in Corstorphine). Suggests that the loss of a few spaces could be balanced with introducing permits to assuage OUTRAGE.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  25. kaputnik
    Moderator

    At 815AM this morning, Roseburn was down to single lane working, controlled by lights, due to power cable works outside Tesco.

    Despite this, the usual queue of traffic in either direction was almost non-existent. So, Roseburn doesn't need all those lanes of traffic, it just needs the school run to be banned.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  26. LivM
    Member

    @Kaputnik also Trades Holidays I think. Ban all workmen!

    Posted 6 years ago #
  27. Stickman
    Member

    @kaputnik: same when I went through yesterday and today. Might not just be down to school holidays though - I suspect that it's when bacon roll loading blocks the inside lane and all eastbound traffic stops until the right turn light changes. The current lane closures means this isn't happening. Close Russell Rd and the problem would disappear (or at least start to disperse elsewhere). West Coates is remarkably quiet. Queues westbound are rarely long in any event - maybe half a dozen vehicles at most, even at peaktime.

    But without all the lanes where would the bacon roll loading take place?

    Also, my current favourite rubbish parking is by the solicitors (Clancy something or other) who most days park their mini outside the office during Greenway hours, facing the wrong direction.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  28. chdot
    Admin

    "

    The board rejected a motion calling to immediately reverse the Venice lane reduction, and approved a motion that keeps the project intact while calling for data to inform a future assessment.

    "

    http://la.streetsblog.org/2017/07/12/after-raucous-public-comment-mar-vista-community-council-votes-to-support-venice-blvd-improvements

    Posted 6 years ago #
  29. chdot
    Admin

  30. Frenchy
    Member

    Pollution is caused by cars not moving while their engines are running.

    I hadn't realised that cars don't pollute when they're moving. This changes everything!

    Posted 6 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin