CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » General Edinburgh

Princes Street Gardens trees chopped down

(46 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. Stickman
    Member

    Apparently for the National Gallery extension.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/edinspotlight/status/1053013035592368129

    *rule 2*.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  2. gembo
    Member

    That is so very bad

    Posted 5 years ago #
  3. Ed1
    Member

    what a barren featureless grassy knoll it looks with no trees

    Posted 5 years ago #
  4. unhurt
    Member

    Wait, have they felled ALL of them along to the Scott Monument? I understand losing some to put in ramp access but this seems like huge overkill.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  5. Blueth
    Member

    I suppose it's no surprise they didn't consult on this.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  6. Harts Cyclery
    Member

    Is there a way to get the bottom of where/when this decision was made? It must have gone through a committee, surely...?

    Posted 5 years ago #
  7. Arellcat
    Moderator

    Tom Parnell says the plans were available for years:

    https://twitter.com/ArchHist/status/1053185346027118593

    Ben Cooper says the tree cutting aspect was well buried.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  8. Frenchy
    Member

    Is there a way to get the bottom of where/when this decision was made? It must have gone through a committee, surely...?

    Went through the Development Management Sub-Committee on 20th June. Papers should be available here: http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/meetings/meeting/4422/development_management_sub-committee

    Posted 5 years ago #
  9. sallyhinch
    Member

    You'd hope that individual members of the public wouldn't need to pile in to prevent 50 mature trees from being chopped down and ultimately replaced by 22 possibly doomed saplings and 'semi-mature' trees. But then again, you'd think that about putting in a 60s gyratory in the middle of a city like Edinburgh too

    Posted 5 years ago #
  10. chrisfl
    Member

    Planning permission is here - https://citydev-portal.edinburgh.gov.uk/idoxpa-web/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=P0WMM8EWG4J00

    The removal of the trees to create ramp to the lower gardens is hard to argue with, but the argument for removing the trees at the front to restore/improve the view feels much more tenuous.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  11. jdanielp
    Member

    @Arellcat

    "But the plans were on display..."
    "On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them."
    "That's the display department."
    "With a flashlight."
    "Ah, well, the lights had probably gone."
    "So had the stairs."
    "But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?"
    "Yes," said Arthur, "yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'."

    Posted 5 years ago #
  12. jdanielp
    Member

    @chrisfl a spokesman is quoted as saying "These views were part of the architect William Henry Playfair's original vision for this world-famous location." All very well and good, but why was a comparable argument with regards Andrew Carnegie's intent ignored when the council made the decision about the gap site behind the library?

    https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/shock-as-edinburgh-council-give-permission-to-fell-50-trees-in-princes-street-gardens-1-4817035

    Posted 5 years ago #
  13. gembo
    Member

    @jdanielp - Arthur also had to travel 4 light years to Alpha Centauri to view those plans? (well first his house was getting knocked down for the ring road but then the whole planet was going for the inter space highway)

    When they Hitchhike on the Vogon constructor fleet His pal Ford Prefect explains that the race known as the Dentrassi supply the inflight catering for the Vogon. But they hate the Vogon so make them terrible food. HOwever if you go to the Dentrassi staff canteen the food there is good. Arthur and Ford then go to the vending machine in the Dentrassi staff canteen and eat the food which is vile. Ford then says a line that has popped into my head about once a month since about 1983

    These Dentrassi must really hate the Vogon

    Posted 5 years ago #
  14. chrisfl
    Member

    I've had a proper read through of the planning application, and the case is pretty good for removing the big tree at the front. Outrage level is stand down.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  15. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Perhaps this is operational land?

    Posted 5 years ago #
  16. Blueth
    Member

    I'm sure Playfair would be touched by the concern for his original vision given what Council projects have previously wreaked on the output of other long-dead architects.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  17. LaidBack
    Member

    I'm sure Playfair would have not been pleased by the gardens having a railway running through them.

    Resistance to the pollution and noise caused by railways meant that trains got no further than Haymarket for years.

    Sometimes this still happens :-)

    Posted 5 years ago #
  18. gembo
    Member

    Play fair steps still well closed without explanation

    Posted 5 years ago #
  19. i
    Member

    While I don't know enough about this situation to have an strong opinion on it, it does remind me of how a reluctance to remove trees or tarmac over "natural" paths can cause more problems than it solves.

    On tree removal.

    On "natural character".

    Posted 5 years ago #
  20. paulmilne
    Member

    I think in this day and age of climate breakdown and rising CO2 levels, a mature tree trumps a view. Every time.

    I'd go so far as to call for a moratorium on felling trees over a certain age unless an undeniable case can be made for removal.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  21. i
    Member

    The tree felling in Princes St may have been overzealous and mature trees might absorb more C02 than new trees (I don't know). And yes it looks quite ugly right now.

    I'm interested in why some trees seem more valuable than others. Compare the thousands of mature trees felled for the Queensferry crossing, was there a proportional outrage there? Are sufficient trees being replaced?

    Sorry for getting philosophical, I want to try and find some perspective in the context of the entire planet.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  22. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    The ability of land plants to hold CO<sub>2</sub> is miniscule compared to that of sea plants and the effects of commercial forestry dwarf this felling every minute of the day.

    I think the point here is amenity and agency. We liked the trees and had no power to save them.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  23. mgj
    Member

    I wonder if they consulted with the International Brigade (and the Spanish?) about the removal (and then reinstatement) of the memorial. (Actually given that the NGS didnt even know it was there, I'd be surprised).

    Posted 5 years ago #
  24. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    I can exclusively reveal that the NGS is an introverted organisation. It does not look outwith its walls very often or very hard.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  25. steveo
    Member

    Sorry for getting philosophical, I want to try and find some perspective in the context of the entire planet.

    I read a study which suggest urban are trees have a far higher positive impact on the mental health of individuals than rural forests. So from a mental health pov the removal of a few dozen trees will have a far greater impact than the clearing for the QC.

    I'm always torn on commercial forests being clear fallen, there is a certain interest in the decimated landscape left behind, probably more so than the dull (and swampy) areas off the paths. But the initial hit after coming round corner and finding nowt but stumps is a bit jarring.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  26. jdanielp
    Member

    @steveo somebody made the argument at the Scottish Green Party Conference at the weekend that tree thinning leads to far greater output over a comparable time period than mass felling, while leaving the landscape looking nicer.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  27. i
    Member

    @stevo yep, it does makes sense in this situation to value the trees for their civic value, from its aesthetics, drainage and even air pollution scrubbing (though I'm sceptical about this effectiveness compared to removing the source of pollution).

    The Leeds iTree project looks interesting. 800 trees removed 11 tonnes of C02 and 250kg of pollutants per year. The average UK car seems to produce about 1-4 tonnes of CO2, but I'm not sure how much other pollutants are produced, let alone the buses.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  28. PS
    Member

    I'm usually delighted to see commercial forests felled. Cold lifeless monocultures. The industry paid some lip service to the idea of mixed species forestry a few years ago, but I've not seen any evidence of that being put into practice.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  29. Cyclingmollie
    Member

    You're lucky you've got trees in your main street at all. We have to make do with an artificial tree substitute pollution filter thing here in Musselburgh.

    The road through the Forest of Castle O'er is beautiful at this time of year when the larches are turning gold.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  30. unhurt
    Member

    Nice Brain Pickings article about a book I just finished:

    https://www.brainpickings.org/2016/09/26/the-hidden-life-of-trees-peter-wohlleben/

    The book made me sad for the amputated lives of urban trees though. They can't communicate, mostly, and they all die young!

    Posted 5 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin