my bike
your employers bike that they kindly lease to you, surely :)
CityCyclingEdinburgh was launched on the 27th of October 2009 as "an experiment".
IT’S TRUE!
CCE is 15years old!
Well done to ALL posters
It soon became useful and entertaining. There are regular posters, people who add useful info occasionally and plenty more who drop by to watch. That's fine. If you want to add news/comments it's easy to register and become a member.
RULES No personal insults. No swearing.
my bike
your employers bike that they kindly lease to you, surely :)
/whistles
Its an energy consultant they are welcome to try and turn a profit on it....
Sorry, I should know better. Pedantry is down there with sarcasm
"Pedantry is down there with sarcasm."
Can someone translate that [the cyclescheme proposal] into English for me? thanks
Typical any government effectively kill something which actually benefits people but was initiated by a previous administration.
I wouldn't say that. It looks like a classic case of HMRC interpreting legislation by the letter (which to be fair is their job) rather than turning a blind eye and going with the spirit of the legislation. They do have a habit of doing this, no matter who is in government at the time.
Can someone translate that [the cyclescheme proposal] into English for me? thanks
I think cyclescheme will buy the bike from your employer probably for no fee then continue to lease it to you for the next 4 years at which point the fair market value drops to the 7% specified by HMRC. Though what i can't see is what the cost for the next four years will be since there must be some cost to keep HRMC off there back.
You'd think HMRC would have actual tax dodgers to go after.
Yes - the cost of the subsequent lease is the key detail missing from that Cyclescheme piece.
I fear that the bureaucracy is going to make the whole scheme somewhat unattractive. I got a healthy saving on my bike, but if I factor into the equation the restrictions of using the scheme (paying full RRP, rather than sale price, timing of the purchase, LBSs' understandable unwillingness to offer any additional discounts etc becasue Cyclescheme have already taken 10% from their sale price, potential split ownership issues if the bike costs more than £1k) plus the HMRC swerveball, I'd be thinking twice about doing it again.
I found it much easier to find the bike I wanted, then watch the shopping comparison websites until one came up in my size with a tasty discount...
Probably what i would have but for the fact that i didn't and still don't have the cash to stump up front. The cheap credit is a major attraction of the scheme, i suppose that element is still there but any possible saving has been boiled off by HMRC ruling.
I didn't intend to go in for a third year but if i were looking at it now i'm not sure i'd bother since most bike shops will still give 0% on sale items either that or there is the hard way (save up).
cheap credit is a major attraction of the scheme
I took matters into my own hands with a 0% for a year on purchases credit card deal and will pay that back in installments.
Thanks guys. Yes, it was the 'what happens for the next 4 years' bit that was confusing me. when i originally read the memo from HMRC my immediate thought was 'why can't i just lease it over 5 years?'. I guess many people don't stay at one job that long.
My employer will give a one-year interest-free loan, but its max £500. Had emailed a few weeks to ask if given the HMRC changes they might consider increasing max loan. No reply yet.
glad I got mine and paid it off, not going for another one (winter bike) as planned now
From Twitter @carltonreid
Cyclescheme's HMRC Market Value Clarification leaflet:
"
My company used to claim the vat back and stead of passing the saving on to us, they'd pocket it and use it to 'administer' the scheme. Won't be doing that now.
Just paid £70 for my mtb to be owned by cyclesheme for the next 4 years....
Thanks for resurecting this. I am about to participate in my employers second round of this, and I had conserns about how muc I would be expected to repay after a year. So am I correct in thinking that a small single figure percentage deposit is taken from the employee after a year, and the hire period is extended to upto 36 months whereby the value of the cycle reduced to zero.
Dave C
You must log in to post.
Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin