@Instography, The poor decisions by juries is symptomatic of a more general problem.
Which is?
CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Cycling News
Another 'It's Okay To Kill Cyclists' Story
(34 posts)-
Posted 12 years ago #
-
Oh, I think Martin Porter's blog catalogues the failings of the entire criminal justice system well enough. If the police don't investigate offences and prosecuting authorities fail to pursue charges, when they charge people with most minor offence available and when they sentence at the most lenient end of the scales available to them we should hardly be surprised that the element of it involving members of the public adopts a similar line and identifies itself with drivers.
Posted 12 years ago # -
Yes, his blog does bring home the appalling truth. I thought this post from 2009 very pertinent to our discussion:
"A human activity which causes this level of carnage ought to be subjected to serious scrutiny and control. However the convenience of the personal automobile has led over the last century to the development of a car culture which largely exempts motoring from the strict regulation of other areas of life in which poor practice costs lives (construction sites, workplaces, product liability, aviation, infectious disease and even dangerous animals).
The main tenets of this car culture can be summarised as follows:
1. The inevitable attrition is a price well worth paying (by unknown others) in return for individual autonomy and convenience (often now described as necessary to the way in which we live our lives).
2. Every physically competent adult has a right to drive, removable only as a punishment for serious or repeated criminal offending and, even then, only temporarily.
3. Conduct which might be regarded as dangerous in any other walk of life is, in a motorist, merely careless and that which would otherwise be careless is excusable. This tenet is coloured by a sense of ‘There but for the grace of God, go I’ in the mind of the individual scrutinising the conduct in question.
4. Road safety efforts should be focussed upon segregating the vulnerable road user from motorised traffic (at the expense of ensuring the safe sharing of road space) and upon encouraging, or even mandating, personal protection to ameliorate the consequences of the collisions which are accepted as inevitable.
5. A myopic view of the fundamental laws of physics which permits motorists to argue that their responsibilities and actions in controlling 1,000+ kgs at up to 70mph should be judged in a similar manner to those controlling less than 100kgs at up to about 20mph. It is not necessary to be an apologist for red light jumping or pavement riding cyclists to point out that the risks they pose are many orders of magnitude less than the risks to pedestrians and cyclists from poorly controlled motor vehicles"
http://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.co.uk/2009/11/cycling-against-car-culture.html
Posted 12 years ago # -
Aye.
Posted 12 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
posts
