Article in today's Herald. Public money being invested in cycle planning and tracking apps for Glasgow:
Also, "smart lighting", which sounds like normal lighting, but more expensive.
What real value could a Glasgow specific cycle planning app have over cyclestreets/google. Also, why would you use an app that tracks routes used by current cyclists to plan infrastructure investment - given these people are the hard core cyclists used to heavy traffic (although they may take sub-optimal routes to avoid the worst traffic) - meaning infrastructure is based on routes most non-cyclists may not want to use.
This is what valuable cycle funding is spent on. I despair.