CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Cycling News

"Cycle Choices Edinburgh"

(9 posts)

Tags:


  1. kaputnik
    Moderator


    "Cycling Choices" by the Magnificent Octopus, on Flickr

    Anyone heard of it? I assume council found it more amusing or just plain easier to create a series of gaudy pink banners, rather than trying to do anything about the narrowed path across the bridge here or the surface between the bridge and the esplanace.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  2. Cyclingmollie
    Member

    or put in a dropped kerb so that you can join the cycle path from the road.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  3. SRD
    Moderator

    that path looks awfully narrow to be shared use...

    Posted 11 years ago #
  4. amir
    Member

    It's not a great path but I'd support the effort to try to get more to try cycling bewteen Portobello and Leith.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  5. chdot
    Admin

    "that path looks awfully narrow to be shared use..."

    It's pretty narrow for bikes or peds only!

    Hadn't realised until k mentioned that there is hatching in the road - no doubt for 'road safety' reasons.

    'Fortunately' that particular bit of pavement doesn't have many peds.

    I believe CEC is looking at what can be done with the barrier/chevrons to reduce 'restriction' on bridge - don't suppose that includes pavement widening...

    As has been mentioned here before doesn't do 'cyclists' any favours if improvements for them/us is by disadvantaging pedestrians.

    SpaceForPeople

    Perhaps the banners are a bit premature.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  6. Min
    Member

    "If its wide enough for one slim person to walk down it is wide enough to be a two-way shared use path"

    Keith Brown

    (not really)

    Posted 11 years ago #
  7. gembo
    Member

    One slim person sideways at the spot in the photo

    Posted 11 years ago #
  8. kaputnik
    Moderator

    I'd support the effort to try to get more to try cycling bewteen Portobello and Leith

    Ditto the effort but not the method. It might sink in at the council that if pinchpoints like that 40m stretch in particular are dealt with then it opens up all the investment in the rest of the path (which is very good, with exception of crossing at Seafield Street) and will get many more people using it.

    Also, putting signs up suggesting you use a path, in the middle of the path itself, seem wasted effort. You aren't going to be able to read them from a car. If they really must put up signs they would be better at the extreme ends.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  9. ggovan
    Member

    I'd always known that there was a cycle route near there, but I could never seem to find it. Turns out I just couldn't recognise it as a cycle path.

    Posted 11 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin