CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Cycling News

Motion by Councillor Orr

(8 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    "
    9.3 By Councillor Orr – Cycling and Active Travel
    “Following the November conferences of Cycling Scotland and Living Streets, Council:
    1. Welcomes the status of Edinburgh as the exemplar local authority for “active travel” in Scotland and notes that an estimated 35% of all trips made by Edinburgh residents are on foot with 7% of journeys to work being by bike; notes our ambitious cycling target of 15% of journeys to work by bike by 2020; and recognises that active travel is the most economical and sustainable form of personal transport.
    2. Welcomes the fact that 57% of Edinburgh’s primary 6 school children have completed “bikeability” cycle training to level 2 (i.e. on-street training, and up from 31% in 2009/10); notes our ambitious targets of 100% by 2016/17; and notes that 130 bikes have been loaned to 13 primary schools under the Positive Action scheme to support this; notes also that 234 pupils also benefited from subsidised bike sales across 16 schools where bike ownership was low.
    3. Welcomes the planned investment in new training facilities for sports cyclists at Huntershall and elsewhere.
    4. Notes the significant potential benefits to Edinburgh of cycle tourism and welcomes the recent “Cycling Tourism Report” recently agreed by the economy committee and which is complimented by investments such as in the cycleway alongside the A90 to South Queensferry, and also our vision for the city centre.

    Asks the Chief Executive for a report to:
    1. Summarise the progress of the Council to date in encouraging cycling and active travel in all its forms, and also highlighting some of our significant plans for the future.
    2. Identify whether it is necessary to take more steps to “mainstream” the support and promotion of cycling and active travel across the council.
    3. Identify potential gaps in current plans to support existing targets around school cycling training and elsewhere; and cycle safety awareness training for drivers of our own fleet of large goods vehicles; and identifying potential solutions to address such gaps.
    4. Assess the need for further support for walking as a travel mode such that it is encouraged and supported in the way that cycling is.
    5. Assess how we can better communicate our achievements and promote what we are doing around cycling and active travel.
    6. Promote and quantify the many health benefits of cycling, and other related benefits to the people of Edinburgh such as reduced congestion, reduced commuting time, reduced carbon emissions and improved air quality.
    7. Investigate implementation and enforcement of the planning policies and guidelines of the Council with regard to supporting cycling and active travel and how these could be improved.”

    The City of Edinburgh Council – 12 December 2013 Page 4 of 8

    http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/download/meetings/id/41688/agenda_of_12_december_2013

    Posted 10 years ago #
  2. LaidBack
    Member

    2. Identify whether it is necessary to take more steps to “mainstream” the support and promotion of cycling and active travel across the council.

    Yes - think it's necessary!

    Sounds all very positive - knowing that Councillor Orr is someone who does cycle often and obviously wants to see more. Saw him at the NMW - Innocent evening.

    Ratio of cycling politicians is less than 7%? Each party has at least one but rarely two?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  3. HankChief
    Member

    Should we be writing to our councillors to support this then?

    Or saying that they should go further...

    If passed, will it make a difference?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  4. gembo
    Member

    Regular council meeting, members of the public can attend. Maybe depends on how it is received. May be we can refer to the motion in future pressure?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  5. chdot
    Admin

    I'm assuming it will be passed as it proposed by the relevant Cllr in the ruling coalition.

    There may not be much debate.

    The point is to raise the profile (which the motion is doing) and - I hope - produce a serious report showing what CEC is doing and any 'gaps'.

    Certainly worth drawing the motion to your councillors' attention and 'hope they vote for it'.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

    "
    Asks the Chief Executive for a report to:
    1. Summarise the progress of the Council to date in encouraging cycling and active travel in all its forms, and also highlighting some of our significant plans for the future.

    "

    Etc.

    I don't think this report has been done - partly because Jim Orr is no longer convenor.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  7. chdot
    Admin

    It appears that this motion really wasn't dealt with properly and no report ever written. (See previous post - or top of thread for all the points meant to be covered.

    It's unclear whether this is uncommon (or indeed unique). My belief has always been that motions like this are dealt with to the letter (however reluctantanly) and the 'problem' comes afterwards when any findings/recommendations are quietly ignored.

    In this case, after he tabled the motion (which was passed by Full Council), Jim Orr fell out with the SNP group and was replaced by Adam McVey. I very much doubt if he was asked 'is it OK if we don't bother with this'.

    It seems that officials now believe that "all of the points were picked up during the recent review of the Active Travel Action Plan".

    I'm not entirely sure that can be true and in any case wasn't what elected councillors agreed should be done. The ATAP, although a proper (and good) CEC policy document can too easily be regarded as 'transport' or even 'just cycling'.

    I genuinely doubt whether the final point has been adequately dealt with -

    "

    7. Investigate implementation and enforcement of the planning policies and guidelines of the Council with regard to supporting cycling and active travel and how these could be improved.

    "

    Happy to be proved wrong.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  8. crowriver
    Member

    "Jim Orr fell out with the SNP group and was replaced by Adam McVey"

    Yeah, that was all a bit odd. He's not even part of the SNP group any more. I wonder what happened? Did he get a bit too high profile for some of the local power brokers (like Cllr Ross for example)? Or did they think he was a bit too chummy with Lesley Hinds et al?

    As for the motion, I note this:

    "3. Identify potential gaps in current plans to support existing targets around school cycling training and elsewhere; and cycle safety "

    I know my son did Bikeability a few years ago, but nothing since (he's now in P6). I've no idea if this is still happening in our school. Certainly my daughter hasn't done any training at school yet. I know that's up to the school, individual heads, etc. so it may just be a gap...

    Posted 8 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin