CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

George Street Improvements

(1192 posts)

  1. chdot
    Admin

    It was great to chair a meeting at
    @RoyalSocEd
    with Cllrs,
    @HistEnvScot
    ,
    @atkinsglobal
    ,
    @fgouldconnect
    ,
    @EdinburghWH
    ,
    @GSAEdin
    ,
    @thecockburn
    and the Edinburgh Access Panel to talk about three things on George Street:
    1 Trees,
    2 Rain Gardens and
    3 Accessibility.

    Progress made!

    https://twitter.com/cllrscottarthur/status/1648749280801300483

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. neddie
    Member

    George Street and First New Town Design Project

    We want to hear what you think about our next phase of the George Street and First New Town project and the design of the cross streets of North Castle Street, Frederick Street and Hanover Street (North)

    https://consultationhub.edinburgh.gov.uk/sfc/george-street-and-first-new-town/

    Closes 8 Feb 2024

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. gembo
    Member

    Big ice rink blocking cars just now but bikes get through

    Posted 1 year ago #
  4. Murun Buchstansangur
    Member

    @gembo except when there’s gin trucks a-dispensing

    Posted 1 year ago #
  5. gembo
    Member

    @murun. Aye. Once you add the gin drinkers it will be no go area.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

    The race is on then…

    The £5.8m project will see the introduction of high-quality pavements and roads, a new cycleway, trees and rain gardens where possible.

    It’s expected that the work will be completed in late autumn 2025.

    https://news.stv.tv/west-central/work-to-transform-argyle-street-in-glasgow-through-5-8m-avenues-project-to-begin-on-may-13

    Posted 6 months ago #
  7. chdot
    Admin

    Meanwhile

    Meadows-GeorgeStreet

    work only due to start late 2025

    http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18147&page=7&replies=189#post-374896

    Posted 6 months ago #
  8. Arellcat
    Moderator

    It’s expected that the work will be completed in late autumn 2025.

    ...work only due to start late 2025

    I appreciate we have words like 'expected', but, really, why is Edinburgh so utterly rubbish at this? The city once dithered about smashing a motorway through its middle, so Glasgow took the spoils and smashed a motorway through its middle instead. Glasgow did lose some architecture along the way, and severed Argyle St, but it's sure had the bit between its teeth ever since.

    The only reason I can think of is that more people live in the city centre of Edinburgh than they do in Glasgow, and that means PARKING.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  9. Morningsider
    Member

    @Arellcat - there is also the fact the Argyll Street project (slightly longer than George Street but narrower) costs £5.8m when George Steet will cost £36m.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  10. boothym
    Member

    The only reason I can think of is that more people live in the city centre of Edinburgh than they do in Glasgow, and that means PARKING.
    Well, that and they have more space to play with? Argyle Street is four lanes with no parking. Victoria Road/South City Way removed the hatched area in the middle of the road and they had parallel routes for the bus gate. St Andrews Drive/South West City Way was four lanes wide with little parking so it was easy to remove a lane: https://www.google.com/maps/@55.8456494,-4.2865576,71m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu

    Where are the places like that in Edinburgh which would be an uncontroversial road to add a cycle track?

    Posted 6 months ago #
  11. Morningsider
    Member

    Lanark Road - Slateford Road - West Approach Road - Lothian Road - Princes Street would seem a good Edinburgh candidate. Possibly the A701 corridor (Gilmerton - Bridges). Not as wide as the Glasgow roads, but wide enough to accommodate cycle lanes.

    Plenty of wide streets in central Edinburgh - Lothian Road, Princes/George/Queen Streets, Leith Walk (!)

    Posted 6 months ago #
  12. gembo
    Member

    Rain garden easier in Glasgow than Edinburgh too.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  13. dessert rat
    Member

    Where are the places like that in Edinburgh which would be an uncontroversial road to add a cycle track?

    Leith Walk being +22m wide all the way down and arrow straight would have seemed an uncontroversial option, but that didn't go so well.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  14. Dave
    Member

    Sue Webber MSP is still posing for attack ads against the Lanark Road cycle lane here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/zMVh89cy3KtvR12s7

    Posted 6 months ago #
  15. gembo
    Member

    There is nothing that can be done with her

    Posted 6 months ago #
  16. acsimpson
    Member

    As others have quoted before "you cannot get someone to understand something when their livelyhood requires them not to."

    Posted 6 months ago #
  17. Claggy Cog
    Member

    "@Arellcat - there is also the fact the Argyll Street project (slightly longer than George Street but narrower) costs £5.8m when George Steet will cost £36m."

    Why six times the cost? Is it materials perhaps...like Carrera marble or some such. We pay workers more? Architects/planners charging an arm and a leg. How long have Edinburgh citizens been overcharged for similar infrastructure plans?

    The Avenues plan for Glasgow will cost 115m altogether and will take in several streets seems like value for money.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  18. Yodhrin
    Member

    @Claggy Cog

    The materials, the endless consultation, the delays caused by faux concern for disabled access - the attitude of heritage-first, endless objections and referrals favoured by the Cockburn you seem to endorse heartily in the other thread has costs and some of them are monetary.

    Glasgow consulted, looked at the evidence to decide what feedback they gathered was actually valid, and just got on with *doing* it rather than pandering for years on end. If someone thought their opinion was more important than experts, decades of evidence(especially that mucky *foreign* sort), or previous democratic mandates they were told to sit down and wait to have their say at the next election. It means things tend to get done more quickly and with less cost.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  19. Morningsider
    Member

    I see that the George Street project is now predicted to cost £39.45m. There will also be:

    1. 24hr access for coaches to drop off hotel guests.
    2. unlimited taxi and PHC access between 7pm and 6am.
    3. 24hr access for taxis and PHCs carrying Blue Badge holders.
    4. Mon-Sat loading between 7pm and 10.30am, Sun loading 7pm to 12.30pm.
    5. A one-way system in operation (presumably only for motorised vehicles).

    Worth noting the £4m cost increase is 71% of the total price of the Sauchiehall Street project - but just an 11% increase in total George Street project cost. I know the projects aren't exactly alike, but come on!

    Posted 6 months ago #
  20. neddie
    Member

    I like how they optimistically state that they’re going to enforce timed loading by physical measures like mechanical bollards, but are also going to allow 24hr access for taxis carrying blue-badges.

    Schroedinger’s bollards.

    Clowns

    Posted 6 months ago #
  21. chdot
    Admin

    Another project being delayed due to changes in how the Scottish Government is funding active travel is the (George Street) Cross Street Project - details: https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/documents/s70543/Item%207.5%20-%20George%20Street%20and%20First%20New%20Town%20Operational%20Plan%20and%20Project%20Update.pdf

    https://x.com/cllrscottarthur/status/1792105876242710796

    Posted 6 months ago #
  22. chdot
    Admin


RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin