CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » General Edinburgh

Council's departments may be dismantled to give residents more power

(9 posts)
  • Started 9 years ago by kaputnik
  • Latest reply from crowriver

No tags yet.


  1. kaputnik
    Moderator

    http://news.stv.tv/east-central/296080-edinburgh-council-may-dismantle-departments-to-devolve-power/

    Edinburgh Council’s departments could be dismantled in an effort to give residents more power.

    Plans to take apart the five departments and give decision-making to neighbourhood partnerships will go before a full council meeting next Thursday.

    After wading through all the business-speak mumbo-jumbo about "strands" and "spines" and "enhanced element of local service delivery" (?!) it is my basic interpretation of this that they want to put more stuff into the hands of the local teams, who currently do the street sweeping and that sort of thing.

    "Further details on how this would work will go before councillors in November."

    A nice idea if it gets things happening, but what implications are there for cycling if, for example, you are having to deal with multiple neighbourhood teams where paths cross boundaries. Or perhaps we would find that areas with active and established cycling communities (e.g. Marchmont, Shandon, parts of Leith) would be more vocal in lobbying their local department, resulting in a patchwork of cycling provision across the city?

    Would you cycle along a nice path, swept of leaves and gritted on the cold days as far as the boundary with the next team when you find yourself skating across a rink of frosted leafmulch?

    Posted 9 years ago #
  2. Ed1
    Member

    Different levels of localism can have advantages or disadvantages. It depends on function or service being delivered. If take to the rediculous if people on each street had control of their street could end up with streets that all closed or no paving etc could be worse for society as a whole. Equally if took to the other extreme had a world government local concerns may be ignored. For things such as cycling infrastructure not sure the addionial localism would be better. Can be strategic advantages having the current geographic areas. Also apart from the intrinsic merits of different areas regarded as a political unit can also be how effect the democratic unit works. Much like the some of the arguments over independence some not based on intrinsic pros or cons but like democratic functioning of different areas considered a unit.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  3. Instography
    Member

    Call me a cynic but I read it as "People! Make your own cuts!"

    Decentralisation (as it was called when it was previously fashionable in the 80s - which just happens to coincide with the last period of substantial cuts to local services) has a long and disastrous history. As does centralisation.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  4. gembo
    Member

    Problem with the current interest in decentralisation to neighbourhoods which is coming from a Scot gov report is that the centre remains big too. The neighbourhood model was tried before and cost money, about ten years ago and this time....?

    Posted 9 years ago #
  5. Ed1
    Member

    I am also cynical may be have effect of a discharge of accountability in respect to cuts. Edinburgh council has been doing such a good job with cycle infrasture I Wonder what the implications of this change may be.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  6. gembo
    Member

    Prime motivator is to comply with Scot gov directive also think they can save money which never worked before and has slight problem of massive city centre office choc full of hot desking thousands, have stopped building mini versions in neighbourhoods, number of neighbourhoods not likely to be so high.

    The passing of the decision making and budgeting to these neighbours long way off.

    Posted 9 years ago #
  7. crowriver
    Member

    In principle, it is a good idea. The neighbourhood partnerships are quite big though, eg. City Centre & Leith is one "neighbourhood", but administrative sub-division within that.

    Must say that the teams in neighbourhood partnerships are (currently) quite fast to respond to e-mails and so on.

    I take the point about cost-cutting, but perhaps by distributing delivery there is a reduced need for "core" admin teams in the big building on New Street? Or maybe not, depends on implementation, as ever...

    Posted 9 years ago #
  8. Instography
    Member

    Cynic means never having to say, "hmm, shame, that's disappointing".

    Posted 9 years ago #
  9. crowriver
    Member

    @Insto, that's not cynicism you're describing, that's pessimism.

    Posted 9 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin