CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

Workplace parking levy

(8 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    Sarah Boyack was keen on this at the start of the first Scottish Parliament.

    Piece in current Private Eye -

    "
    R O A D R A G E

    Parking clots

    LAUNCHING an economic plan in Derby last week, chancellor George Osborne trumpeted road schemes and city devolution - but not the workplace parking levy which is giving nearby Nottingham a hefty transport boost.

    Free parking at work encourages commuters to choke rush-hour roads and pollute city air with their cars and to ignore alternatives like cycling and public transport. In 2012, Nottingham city council introduced Britain's first workplace parking levy (WPL), payable by firms with more than 10 parking spaces. Th annual charge is now £375 per space, which firms can recoup from staff if they like.

    Income from the levy is reserved for transport. It has already helped Nottingham build two tram lines (expected to open this summer), improve its main rail station and amass Europe's biggest electric bus fleet (excluding trolleybus fleets that run overhead power cables). WPL money has sustained bus services for commuters, shoppers and hospital visitors, while elsewhere in Britain cash-strapped councils have axed hundreds of bus services.

    Labour authorised Nottingham's WPL in 2009, despite the Institute of Directors warning the levy would be "bad for the competitiveness of local businesses". The CBI moaned "It will not help congestion, will not pay for the schemes the council thinks it will and places businesses hit by the levy at an unfair disadvantage". The region's chamber of commerce was certain the levy "will cost jobs and it will force businesses to rethink their situations".

    In 2009, chemist-shop chain Alliance Boots, then fresh from shifting its nominal HQ from Nottingham to a Swiss tax haven, demanded an immediate public inquiry into the government's "outrageous" consent for the WPL. Despite exemption for small firms, even the Federation of Small Business saying local suppliers would suffer if the levy made large employers relocate.

    Taking all this as gospel, senior Tories used an early day motion in 2009 to demand the WPL be annulled. David Cameron signed and transport secretary Theresa Villiers warned of the impact on jobs. To his credit, Tory transport secretary Philip Hammond declined to know the WPL in 2010, explaining that "localism" resulted in councils doing things which "are not alway in accordance with our own preferences and priorities".

    That must have dismayed local MP and staunch WPL opponent Anna Soubry, who had lots to say about the profound effect on businesses before the WPL began. Since then she has been rather quieter, perhaps because, er, no employers moved out of Nottingham in response to the levy. Indeed the citiy's economy has grown, broadly in line with Britain's, and new business start-ups there rocketed by 36 percent in 2013.

    The WPL might help Nottingham attract new employers as it is a clear defence against Osbornian austerity for the city's vital public transport. It hasn't triggered the feared economic meltdown – so how much longer will it take the Tories to change tack and encourage other cities to consider WPLs?

    'Hedgehog'

    "

    Posted 8 years ago #
  2. Tulyar
    Member

    I'll be in Nottingham this week - anything you want bringing back?

    Will send photos of recent patch-up work at HYM on tram too

    Posted 8 years ago #
  3. DdF
    Member

    We need more than a workplace parking levy - we need a car spaces levy. All workplaces and public destinations such as superstores and leisure complexes would be charged according to the number of car spaces (over a minimum, say 10 - I think Nottingham does that too).

    Note that, like Nottingham, it is the organisation that gets charged the levy, not the car driver. Because parties are very unlikely to adopt a policy which levies a new charge on drivers. [Obviously some orgs will then decide to pass on the charge to drivers, and hopefully most orgs will do more to promote sustainable transport, so they can reduce their parking spaces and their levy].

    When they first came in the SNP considered a charge on large stores (unfortunately not based on car spaces) and a workplace parking levy, but they lost nerve on both - showing that it is a politically sensitive issue. Best hope would be if as many parties as possible had it in their manifestos.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  4. chdot
    Admin

    "Best hope would be if as many parties as possible had it in their manifestos."

    Yes

    "

    Cycling Edinburgh (@CyclingEdin)
    14/06/2015 12:25
    Which parties will back workplace parking levy in 2016?

    http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14972

    @theSNP @scottishlabour @ScotTories @scotlibdems @scotgp

    "

    Agree on non-workplace levy too.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  5. chdot
    Admin

    "

    Gavin Corbett (@gavincorbett)
    14/06/2015 13:44
    .@CyclingEdin @theSNP @scottishlabour @ScotTories @scotlibdems @scotgp See http://www.edinburghgreens.org.uk/site/blog/alternative-budget/for @EdinburghGreens support for levy.

    "

    Posted 8 years ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

    workplace parking charges to help pay for cut-price public transport deals and bike-to-work schemes

    "

    2011 manifesto

    http://www.scottishgreens.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2015/04/GreenHolyrood2011.pdf

    Posted 8 years ago #
  7. wee folding bike
    Member

    I might engage in a little special pleading for my cow-orkers.

    Schools are usually in places where people live rather than town centres. This can make getting there by public transport complex.

    You don't want to live too close to the school because kids see you in mufti, going for your messages, sitting in the front garden stripping a three speed hub on a sunny Sunday evening etc. Without fail they let you know if they've seen you outwith school. I'm not sure why it's such a special event for them.

    You also don't want to park a car outside the school car park. I worked in a school 12 years ago where the council decreased the size of the car park and staff had to park outside in the street. After a few broken windows the school allowed people to park round the back of the building.

    Once more I'm the only cyclist. Even in the nice weather.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  8. gembo
    Member

    Will be interesting to see where the staff carpark goes at the new boroughmuir site. Very small footprint.

    Anyway off to Dublin now and will see if I am as amazed at the increase in cycling? Last week in London it was very apparent from the spot I took up to do my count.

    Posted 8 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin