CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Commuting

The 2nd Annual Citycycling Lights Review Thingy (Part 1)

(30 posts)
  • Started 13 years ago by Wilmington's Cow
  • Latest reply from Mellow Velo

Tags:


  1. Well it's about time, says The Bike Chain (and yes, this does mean you're getting your lights back, though not likely today, rather tomorrow...).

    'Part 1' because I'm also putting a video up of some ride-bys and photos of the light strength, but this is impressions of the lights, pros and cons.

    And yes. There is dancing and juggling again.

    [+] Embed the video | Video DownloadGet the Video Plugins

    Posted 13 years ago #
  2. p.s. no lights were harmed during the filming of this video, even if you watch to the end. At least. None of The Bike Chain's lights.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  3. Cyclingmollie
    Member

    Great film. Looking forward to the second part. I did replay the part where you talk about the jackets changing to see if you had dropped in a little visual joke but I don't think you did.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  4. LaidBack
    Member

    Good presentation Anth... look forward to part 2.

    (I also note your garage has furniture now... the forumers can drop by for coffee;-)

    Niterider set did really well on the Belgian Dutch ride.

    Front pattern isn't as good as my single LED Cateye ?? but still good enough. I used both lights.
    The Ultrafazer switch is good as it can't be accidently activated unlike Cateye. Case also opens nicely as you say. Changing batteries should be easy. they also make point that re-chargeables are fine for Nitrider.

    I'm in love with the Cherrybomb though. Had it hooked onto my rack top bag so light came off with my luggage.

    Here's my pic of them in use (again...)

    That's the Cherrybomb side on in flash mode.
    A worthy successor to the wee LED oval lights that Cateye introduced at the start of the LED revolution.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  5. kaputnik
    Moderator

    great video. Amusing, entertaining and educational

    Posted 13 years ago #
  6. Min
    Member

    Hehe, cool. I particularly liked the bouncability test at the end. Especially useful when considering pothole ruggedness.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  7. Arellcat
    Moderator

    I also note your garage has furniture now...

    I think Anth is aiming to have the SEEKRIT Bunker of the North.

    Top job, Anth, and nicely edited. Looking forward to the next part!

    Posted 13 years ago #
  8. thebikechain
    Member

    Anth this is fantastic. No idea you were quite the Clooney type.

    Can we use this vid on our site and Facebook please - oh and you need to call me when you get a minute. I have made some plans that you would be ideal to help implement.

    Genius.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  9. wingpig
    Member

    As coincidence would have it, the clip on my EL-170 snapped last week, rendering it suitable only for sticking in the mesh side pocket of my bag. I wonder what I could replace it with?

    Posted 13 years ago #
  10. @thebikechain - of course you can use it! Just glad you're happy with it. As for 'Clooney', I actually tried to get a few tv production companies interested in a 'Bike Show' idea last year (along the lines of the Gadget Show or Top Gear), obviously with me as one of the presenters. Got a tiny sniff from one and met for coffee, but they thought it was 'too niche' (non-cyclists y'see, there are shows out there, more than one, about fishing fercrissakes!) and that as a middle class (loyalty to my rather less than middle class roots lead me to correct them here) white male it was harder to get onto telly these days. Though looking at new programmes coming out all the time that was clearly garbage.

    Anyway, I'm hoping the relaunched citycycling (yes Laidback, it's finally on the horizon!!!) will have a few more videos like this.

    @arellcat and laidback - I wish the sofa lived in there all the time. Actually. No, I don't, it takes up valuable bike space... Was waiting for a freecycler to collect it.

    @wingpig - funnily enough, I've got a few views on that now. Actually, uch as I love the CherryBomb I'll sing the praises of the Smart Lunar rear light as well - step above the Polaris versions.

    @Cyclingmollie - can't believe I missed the chance to do that!

    Now if you don't mind, I'm off into a terribly important meeting with my agent about some show that involves dancing.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  11. chdot
    Admin

    "white male it was harder to get onto telly these days"

    Nah, you're just too tall to fit.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  12. That's altogether more plausible. Forget widescreen telly, we need new 'taller' televisions!

    Posted 13 years ago #
  13. spitfire
    Member

    @anth - "Was waiting for a freecycler to collect it."

    do you mean freegle now or is there still a freecycle group for Edinburgh hanging on?
    I was one of the moderators and followed the split from freecycle to freegle with little interest...

    Posted 13 years ago #
  14. Yeah, for someone who hadn't seen the split happen that was rather confusing! There's a freecycle hanging on in YahooGroups, and on a quick look it seemed to have more things getting posted than Freegle, so I went that route and had someone agreeing to take the sofa within about 15 minutes!

    Posted 13 years ago #
  15. Stepdoh
    Member

    Anth is only available in IMAX, apparently.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  16. spitfire
    Member

    A cyclist friend told me last night the flashing mode on any lights is illegal and that the small print will state this... Flashing is only meant for off road (fnarr fnarr) can anyone verify?

    Posted 13 years ago #
  17. Cyclist friend is speaking rubbish - lights these days (and for about two years now) are perfectly legal just flashing rather than steady.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  18. From the CTC:

    Flashers
    Thanks to the enactment of Statutory Instrument 2005 No. 2559: on 23rd October 2005, it finally became legal to have a flashing light on a pedal cycle. Even better: it became possible for a flashing light to be approved, meaning no other light would be needed in that position. And since BS6102/3 does not yet cater for flashing (but is likely to be amended to do so quite soon), approval is for the time being, granted simply on the basis of brightness.

    Because DfT very much prefer anything that possibly can be evaluated against a proper technical standard, so to be evaluated: any flashing lamp that is also capable of emitting a steady light is approved only if it conforms with BS6102/3 when switched to steady mode. Since most (probably all) flashing lights do also have a steady mode, and since none of their manufacturers can be bothered to test and mark them to the pernickety standards of one small country on the fringes of Europe, it's unlikely that any flashing light actually qualifies for approval. But since it became theoretically legal to ride a bike with only flashing lights on it, the Police are nowadays no more likely to quibble its legal status than one equipped with steady lights – unless they're rather dim or involved in an accident of course.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  19. spitfire
    Member

    rubbish? I prefer "misinformed" or "out of date"
    this is a friend of mine you are talking about
    this was info from an ex-traffic cop so that may explain the out of date info

    Posted 13 years ago #
  20. Figure of speech (if one of my friends had said something that was wrong and someone else said they were speaking 'rubbish' I'd have to agree - but I can see your point, put more 'diplomatically' they are 'incorrect in their assertion which appears to be based on past experience and knowledge which has been superceded' :P )

    (and you're welcome for the information that was requested... ;) )

    Posted 13 years ago #
  21. Dave
    Member

    More prosaically, if the light also has a steady mode (which every one I've seen does) then it needs to be 'approved' and given a kitemark or equivalent (which almost none of them do).

    So, in reality it's true to say that almost all cyclists with flashing lights, and more or less the same number with steady lights, are illegal...

    Posted 13 years ago #
  22. Certainly seems that way Dave. It's an interesting conundrum, because I reckon that the majority of those lights would be approved if the manufacturers were to put them through the process. But as the CTC says, most are unlikely to do so. But is any government going to stop bike shops selling any lights (probably being 95%) that don't have the kitemark?

    Posted 13 years ago #
  23. Smudge
    Member

    Vehicle lighting regs say BS approved or approved by another country iirc, so doesn't a CE mark count?

    Posted 13 years ago #
  24. Dave
    Member

    Yep, under euro regulations we have to accept equivalent standards, so you can go with German lights etc no problem - they will all have the appropriate stamp (the fine for having an unapproved light is higher than having no light, apparently).

    As Anth says, it's more that light manufacturers can't be bothered to submit their designs for testing, rather than they are sub-standard.

    For example, if your light has no steady mode it simply has to output 4 candela to be legal. It's a minefield converting between figures but as far as I can tell, a typical 3 LED rear light will output 100 candela on fresh batteries.

    Many countries do it quite differently. For example, requiring a light which is "clearly visible from 500m" which is really a lot more sensible (especially as it takes account of battery condition - you can actually be legal on a BS-approved light on the last gasp of terminally dying batteries, but illegal with a fresh Cherrybomb).

    Posted 13 years ago #
  25. kaputnik
    Moderator

    What's better than cycling your fauxie down George IVth bridge in the dark with no lights? Cycling it down the right hand lane of course! And then going the wrong way down the 1-way system on Forest Road and mounting the pavement to try and cut 3 seconds off your ride. I went the "proper" way round (with lights on) waited at the reds and still got onto MMW too far ahead of the bozo to issue him a stern reprimand.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  26. SRD
    Moderator

    Lots of no-lighters in the meadows tonight, but I was following 3 yr old who only has a red rear light at the moment, so I can't complain. I'd put new batteries in the helmet light though, so my lights pretty much covered her too.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  27. wingpig
    Member

    A car actually gave me as much room as it would have had to have left me had I been a car this evening, possibly helped by a TL-AU100 beneath the saddle, a TL-LD170 in the right pocket of my bag and a CherryBomb at the back of my head.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  28. chdot
    Admin

    Not withstanding the wonderfulness of Anth's work, ths might interest -

    Buyer's guide: cycle lights on road.cc

    Posted 13 years ago #
  29. ruggtomcat
    Member

    I have something to add about the Ultraphazer 5, no battery life.

    I have been running one beside this for the last month or so and in that time ive changed the batteries twice in the ultrafazer and zero times in the EBC one, wich i bought much earlier. They have very similar outputs.

    Two AA's are not enough to run 5 leds for any length of time, sorry :(

    not that im happy with the EBC one, its got a lose connection somewhere and after a cobbled section i have to give it a wrap with my knuckles to get it working again...

    Posted 13 years ago #
  30. Mellow Velo
    Member

    Been using my Niterider Minewt 250 for 7 days now and conscientiously pointing it with due diligence away from my brethren. I have to say it has changed driver behaviour towards me for the better. Natty in flash mode awakens hibernating dormice on full beam. Haven't needed to recharge it yet. Srongly recommend.

    Posted 13 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin