CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Cycling News

The Lance Armstrong Story - Stop at Nothing

(29 posts)
  • Started 7 years ago by crowriver
  • Latest reply from I were right about that saddle

No tags yet.


  1. crowriver
    Member

    On BBC4 in about 10 minutes...

    Posted 7 years ago #
  2. crowriver
    Member

    On NOW.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  3. mercury1and2
    Member

    if anybody missed this you can watch on utube or itplayer i think

    Posted 7 years ago #
  4. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Watched The Programme on iPlayer last night. I guess everyone has seen it. Made me reflect on many things, including the last Tour I attended - Armstrong's last win in 2005 where I saw them coming up the Col des Écharmeaux at about the same speed as I'd go down it.

    But for the virus today would be the Seven Hills of Edinburgh race - the only one I've run multiple times in a serious effort to get a time. I did a whole winter's training one year with a weighted rucksack but it never once occurred to me to dope. I just had far too much respect for the event and being able to look everyone else in the eye afterwards.

    The worst thing I did was the year when my training went wrong and I wasn't race fit so I entered the Challenge rather than the Race. I was leading and I realised the guy behind me didn't know the route so I dropped back at Pollock Halls and let him run off into Dumbiedykes never to be seen again. Not very nice but picking a route is a valid part of the event.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  5. gembo
    Member

    @IWRATS not doping cancels out killing the guy who did not know the route, No Penance

    Posted 3 years ago #
  6. Frenchy
    Member

    How long does one have to not dope for to cancel out one murder?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  7. gembo
    Member

    @Frenchy. Another Ecumenical matter I am afraid

    Posted 3 years ago #
  8. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    The guy's name was very distinctive and I Google sometimes to see if he ever turned up. No luck yet.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  9. stiltskin
    Member

    Not very nice but picking a route is a valid part of the event.
    As is, I suspect, the ability to recognise a hill.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  10. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    @stiltskin

    To be fair the competitors are in extremis in Newington. Hallucinations, the lot.

    I fell coming off Arthur's Seat one year, tumbling down the turf. As I picked myself up a tourist asked me the time and I entered a paranoid fugue state where this person was trying to subtly tell me I'd blacked out for hours and the race had packed up. I was convinced this was true until I reached the finish line.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  11. Frenchy
    Member

    As is, I suspect, the ability to recognise a hill.

    I'd turn round and run the other way too if I saw Arthur's Seat in front of me after running 12 miles.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  12. Morningsider
    Member

    I've only done the 7 hills once - I ran a different route down Arthur's Seat than I had planned. I just didn't realise, even though I have ran up, down, round and over that hill hundreds of times. It also took me a couple of minutes to find the finish line on Calton Hill.

    It's rather tough going.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  13. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    I always ran with a tenner in my shoe so I could get back to the start as long as I could still speak. Some pretty good runners have blown up on that event. I pulled a whitey training one year.

    But I don't think many entrants dope and if anyone did nobody would give them the time of day ever again.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  14. fimm
    Member

    Mr fimm ran the 10 Tumps* of Edinburgh the other weekend - we met someone we know who said it would have been the 7 Hills Race that weekend which we didn't know.
    I've only done the 7 Hills once - it was good fun, especially the scramble up onto Arthur's Seat. Definitely worth knowing the route before you start, though.

    *Tump = 30 metre prominence - i.e. a hill which climbs at least 30 metres above its col. The Edinburgh ones are the 7 Hills plus Wester Craiglockhart, Salisbury Crags and Dunsapie. I'd never been up the latter two before. I ran home after we'd done the Holyrood Park hills.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  15. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    @fimm

    It is a matter of some consternation to me that Craigmillar Hill is treated with quite such disdain. It might as well be invisible, despite having an actual medieval castle on top of it.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  16. Frenchy
    Member

    As far as I can tell, Craigmillar Hill has a prominence of ~24m.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  17. gembo
    Member

    Semi-tump thenor STump

    Posted 3 years ago #
  18. Frenchy
    Member

    The key col for Craigmillar Hill is Old Dalkeith Road, just between Kingston Avenue and Craigmillar Castle Road.

    Which raises the important question:

    Can we redesign Old Dalkeith Road in such a way that cycling on it becomes safe, AND means that Craigmillar Hill attains its rightful place on the list of tumps?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  19. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    I was recently in correspondence with a local narcissist. If they had added 'I have a prominence of over a kilometre' to one of their missives it would have been no less mad.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  20. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    @Frenchy

    Tunnel or stilts? Spit it out man!

    Posted 3 years ago #
  21. Frenchy
    Member

    Think we need to lower the road by 6m*, then build an elevated cycleway over it so that the cycleway is flat. Would need to be done in such a way that whoever determines the altitude measures to the road, rather than the cycleway, which precludes a simple tunnel.

    *Less if we deposit the extracted soil on top of Craigmillar Hill.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  22. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    No soil on the hill, otherwise please proceed to execution.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  23. Frenchy
    Member

    I'll submit it in the next round of consultations on the KB-BioQuarter route. Expect delivery in 2034.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  24. fimm
    Member

    IWRATS, you fool, don't want your favourite hill on a List. People will come and climb it then... keep your solitude.
    ;-)

    Posted 3 years ago #
  25. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    @fimm

    An excellent pair of points well made.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  26. paddyirish
    Member

    Discussion of Tumps makes me laugh - made me recall an excellent article recently on Mountaineering in East Anglia. Highlights included

    "the classic traverse of Strumpshaw Railway Bridge",

    "the first ascent of the Haisborough Sands",

    "the majestic Scroby Sands, the main ridge of which can be seen abutting the skyline at most low tides. The traverse of this ridge has been recognised as the last big challenge for East Anglian mountaineering. Several attempts have been made on this ridge, both with and without oxygen"

    Posted 3 years ago #
  27. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Craigmillar Hill summit is over 90m and the Niddrie Burn at the hospital is under 50m but it's not a TuMP?

    Clear discrimination.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  28. fimm
    Member

    IWRATS I get my obscure hill list information from here: https://www.hill-bagging.co.uk/index.php

    where they say

    A Tump is a hill in Scotland, England, Wales, the Isle of Man or Channel Islands which is separated from adjacent tops by a height difference of at least 30 metres on all sides.

    You are welcome to go and discuss matters with them, but I think they are unashamedly already very geeky on such things...

    Posted 3 years ago #
  29. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Ah, on all sides. I see, I see. I shall call the dogs off.

    Posted 3 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin