Hankchief brilliantly skewers Cllr Cook.
CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure
T&E committee on Roseburn
(342 posts)-
Posted 8 years ago #
-
HanKChief doing brilliantly to restrain himself from calling PG's campaign a pack of lies. Well done.
Posted 8 years ago # -
Adam seems to be talking about an unknown Option C!
Posted 8 years ago # -
I can't figure out what Cllr McVey's question is either.
His initial point that Sustrans marked down the scheme in the recent funding award due to the NIMBY hysteria is pretty worrying though - i.e. why fund 'B' because it's crap, but why fund 'A' because it's unpopular.
Posted 8 years ago # -
Adam seems to be talking about an unknown Option C!
That's the rabbit to come out of the hat when we reach item 7.5, well after the deputations.
Posted 8 years ago # -
Lesley saying "important to move forward" to get 'whole route - not just argue about Roseburn'
Which is fine but CEC 'invented' the options of A and B - but seem to 'blaming' both sides for the polarising!
Posted 8 years ago # -
Now the PG show.
Posted 8 years ago # -
Well done to HankChief and Rosie.
Thought HankChief in particular was outstanding.
Posted 8 years ago # -
Thanks guys.
Fingers crossed...
Posted 8 years ago # -
Bloody hell, PG hasn't got his cycle helmet on!
Posted 8 years ago # -
That's the rabbit to come out of the hat when we reach item 7.5, well after the deputations.
Can anyone see the rabbit?
Posted 8 years ago # -
'Tesco and Scotmid get their own loading bays but small traders don't'
That's because the picture framer doesn't need an HGV, Peter
Posted 8 years ago # -
Thanks guys.
Fingers crossed...
Thanks, you did great.
Posted 8 years ago # -
PG
"As far as I can see parking and load cut by half"
"Only Co-op and Tesco have dedicated loading"
Really??
Posted 8 years ago # -
Would hope the Green councillors pull him up for this nonsense....
Posted 8 years ago # -
'The council hasn't done a traffic study'
Posted 8 years ago # -
indeed - excellently done HankChief and Rosie
Posted 8 years ago # -
*Doesn't like cycling down Roseburn Terrace - it's "big and noisy".*
*Argues against a segregated cycle lane.*
I'm done.
Posted 8 years ago # -
PG "4 lanes down to 2"
Posted 8 years ago # -
PG
"Volume of traffic issue here"
Indeed!
Posted 8 years ago # -
Quite glad I got asked the follow up questions as it allowed me to fit in the stuff I didn't manage in my pitch.
Posted 8 years ago # -
PG's buddy now making a deputation on behalf of Heart of Midlothian FC and ScotRail Ltd.
No actual swept path analysis being used, just rectangles in awkward places on the road.
Posted 8 years ago # -
Other speaker talking about difficulty of getting rail carriages to Haymarket Depot if Option A widens pavements.
Posted 8 years ago # -
"Can anyone see the rabbit?"
"1. Recommendations
...
1.1.2 selects one of the two options presented for the Roseburn area along with the amended designs for other parts of the route..."Is that a binding recommendation or do they get to do what they want, convenors permitting?
Posted 8 years ago # -
Did ScotRail or any coach operators object? No. The new depot at Millerhill for the electric train fleet should sort any concerns about access to Haymarket.
Are Edinburgh pensioners uniquely frail or stupid? Floating bus stops work lots of other places.
Posted 8 years ago # -
WTF? If you might miss a bus you fall over? This is embarrassing.
Posted 8 years ago # -
Simply lies about police, fire and ambulance access.
Posted 8 years ago # -
PG reveals his true cause: he doesn't want cycles on the road at all. Load them on to buses instead!
Posted 8 years ago # -
"impossible to see" how the fire service could cope with these "severe changes" according to PG.
Did they not respond to the consultation? Did they only respond to PG personally?
Posted 8 years ago # -
Can't watch at work, is he just spouting nonsense in the hope something will resonate with enough people to swing it?
Posted 8 years ago #
Reply »
You must log in to post.
posts
