CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

T&E committee on Roseburn

(342 posts)
  • Started 10 years ago by chdot
  • Latest reply from Edinburgh Cycle Training

No tags yet.


  1. cb
    Member

    Where's the fast forward button?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  2. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Does Option A include the slaughter of bus drivers' children?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  3. Rob
    Member

    "You're afraid to run them (cyclists) over because they're in your way."

    I can't tell if this one is for or against the separated-from-the-road-cycle-route.

    Did it just descend into anti-cycling in general ranting for a few minutes there?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  4. wingpig
    Member

    I suppose the buses are already almost at breaking point because of the 20mph thing. I'm quite surprised anyone managed to get to the meeting today, considering the invisible city-wide gridlock.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  5. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Did it just descend into anti-cycling in general ranting for a few minutes there?

    Picture framer suggested new-build gold standard dedicated cycle network across the city, then further suggested the vehicular slaughter of inconvenient bicyclists under the current arrangements.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  6. Klaxon
    Member

    The UNITE guy speaks very clearly but at a speed reminiscent of the DMV sloth in Zootopia

    Posted 10 years ago #
  7. chdot
    Admin

    10 min break with LH talking to all parties' transport spokesmen about "a motion".

    Posted 10 years ago #
  8. Klaxon
    Member

    Anyone there care to share who's providing the break buffet? Is it The Fudge House or Fudge Kitchen?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  9. ih
    Member

    Came in at HankChief's deputation. I might be biased but I thought Henry, Rosie and Richard came across brilliantly, balanced and thoughtful, whereas all the other deputations sounded, well, slightly unhinged.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  10. The Boy
    Member

    Vigo Delicatessen and Roseburn Cafe, I think?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  11. HankChief
    Member

    Huddle of party transport leaders with Lesley has broken up...

    No idea what was said/agreed.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  12. kaputnik
    Moderator

    10 min break with LH talking to all parties' transport spokesmen about "a motion".

    Option F: do nothing. Go away. Try again?

    (actually probably better than jumping into option B)

    A is for A-OK.
    B is for Bo...

    Oh, rule 2 of the forum.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  13. ih
    Member

    Noticed that Robert Smart, the MCC rep, and a local, stumbled over the names of 3 streets. Remember the grief that Phil Noble got at the lynching meeting for not remembering one of the street names.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  14. Klaxon
    Member

    We're back

    Posted 10 years ago #
  15. chdot
    Admin

    "

    Adam McVey (@adamrmcvey)
    30/08/2016, 12:46
    Good piece on relationship between different road users

    Policy being looked at by @theSNP

    http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/jodi-gordon-why-the-cyclist-and-the-driver-should-be-friends-1-4215733

    "

    Posted 10 years ago #
  16. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Do council meetings always hop around agenda items like this? No wonder they decide some odd things.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  17. Klaxon
    Member

    It would appear someone decided putting the longest running agenda item in the middle of the programme was a silly idea.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  18. Klaxon
    Member

    I'm a bit puzzled about this '15 day limit for events in parks' thing currently being discussed. Princes St Gardens and St Andrew Sq are reliably covered for far more?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  19. HankChief
    Member

    Motion published

    https://twitter.com/hank_chief/status/770595060312408064

    Support route in principal but Working group to figure out the details

    Posted 10 years ago #
  20. Klaxon
    Member

    So 'Option C' is 'choose neither and delay project to talk more'

    Posted 10 years ago #
  21. crowriver
    Member

    In other words, the worst possible outcome.

    Cue local elections next year, SNP largest party, whole scheme quietly dropped...

    Hope I'm wrong but I'm not at all optimistic. I hardly think % for cycling will survive either. 'Austerity', 'uncertain times', or some other excuse will be used to 'free up' transport cash so those pesky potholes can be fixed.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  22. chdot
    Admin

    So much for the PUBLIC consultation process which didn't have Option B.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  23. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Whatever else this is it paints the original consultation process in a very poor light.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  24. chdot
    Admin

    LH 'invested in cycling, making a difference'

    Posted 10 years ago #
  25. Stickman
    Member

    "Nice to see a dad with his kid taking him to school through Inverleith Park"

    Yes, through a safe traffic-free park.

    Join.

    The.

    Dots.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  26. Klaxon
    Member

    We had a single option consultation

    Then we had a two option meeting

    Now we're going back to the drawing board?

    Isn't project management supposed to go the other way?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  27. chdot
    Admin

    Adam 'fail to see how Roseburn Terrace is acting optimally'

    Posted 10 years ago #
  28. chdot
    Admin

    Adam 'hope all groups will engage in good faith'

    Posted 10 years ago #
  29. Stickman
    Member

    "Whatever else this is it paints the original consultation process in a very poor light."

    I said elsewhere that the three local councillors for Roseburn should be embarrassed by their part in this. They abdicated responsibility from day one and let a local s**t-stirrer fill the void. As a result all that has happened is lies, misinformation and hysteria have swamped genuine concerns and we've wasted 9 months to get to this stage. If they had led, explained the scheme, built consensus and worked from the front we would be in a better position.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  30. chdot
    Admin

    Nigel Bagshaw 'agree, but could go further'

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin