CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

WEATN - West Edinburgh Active Travel Network (WEL)

(132 posts)

  1. HankChief
    Member

    "quiet street" = signs only.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  2. Morningsider
    Member

    HC - thanks. Disappointing that "quiet streets" are really just "streets".

    Posted 5 years ago #
  3. Harts Cyclery
    Member

    = indirect cop out.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  4. HankChief
    Member

    (but) = cheap and quickly deliverable...

    Would be a much smaller route if they chose to segregate all of it. Choices need to be made given he funds available and the CL+ scheme had a maximum that could be applied for, which WEL took advantage of.

    The lion share of it from South Gyle Broadway to Harvester Way is segregated with only a few bits shared use.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  5. HankChief
    Member

  6. HankChief
    Member

  7. chdot
    Admin

    Ian Maxwell, of cycling campaign group Spokes, said: “While this scheme is certainly a welcome addition to Edinburgh’s growing network, it is frustrating that nothing has been built in the two years since Edinburgh won this funding. The city risks losing this government funding if they cannot make some progress.”


    How much risk?

    Posted 5 years ago #
  8. jonty
    Member

  9. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    proposals to create more than two miles of segregated cycle tracks

    They're just trolling us openly now aren't they?

    Posted 5 years ago #
  10. chdot
    Admin

    From link. -

    A series of drop-in events are being held at the Gyle Shopping Centre, Westside Plaza, and South Gyle Crescent from March 21.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  11. Rosie
    Member

    Further drop-ins
    • Westside Plaza, 4 April, 12pm to 5.30pm
    • South Gyle Crescent, 25 April, 8am-5.30pm
    • Gyle Shopping Centre, 27 April, 10am to 4pm

    These are very unfriendly times if you don't work or live in the area, yet these routes are significant for Edinburgh cyclists in general.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  12. HankChief
    Member

  13. neddie
    Member

    Has anyone completed the survey and filled out your email address?

    If so, did you get an acknowledgement email?

    (I am starting to worry, because I sent the survey from work, which goes through a non-UK proxy)

    Posted 5 years ago #
  14. Frenchy
    Member

    Filled it out quarter an hour ago. Haven't had an acknowledgement email yet, will let you know if that changes.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  15. neddie
    Member

    I put together some thoughts on the details of the cycle route and used them to form my response o the survey. See below:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5ojq58gztxpc3u/weatn%20response.txt?dl=0

    Please feel free to crib or use the info if writing your own response.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  16. Frenchy
    Member

    "8. A segregated cycle connection needs to be made to the canal towpath."

    Was looking at this myself recently. Do you have any ideas for a specific route?

    Posted 5 years ago #
  17. toomanybikes
    Member

    I saw these this weekend for the first time, which were very effective at slowing motor traffic down without impeding bicycles

    https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5332545,-0.1029628,3a,75y,184.37h,72.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sVX42bG6btJoEUpRnRo8Rcw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

    everyone slowed down to about 2 mph to drive through them, encouraging use of the main road. Don't think you could get a HGV through if you wanted.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  18. Frenchy
    Member

    It's...beautiful.

    Posted 5 years ago #
  19. jonty
    Member

    There's something like that in Newbridge. I think it's to stop lorries coming through the village bit.

    https://goo.gl/maps/MeDjptkACrr

    Posted 5 years ago #
  20. Rosie
    Member

    Spokes response:-

    WEST EDINBURGH LINK –
    Consultation deadline 10 May

    Spokes Response

    Spokes welcomes the concept of a dedicated cycle route between Bughtlin and Wester Hailes. The main route goes reasonably direct, doesn't take devious ways "round-the-houses", and connects many popular destinations, though not the schools and large shopping centres. We are particularly impressed with the proposal for a new bridge over the Fife railway at Gogarloch Syke. There are a few details that we don't like, but nothing that can't be improved with some tweaks.

    What we don't like

    The segregated cycle path on Bankhead Avenue is only 2.5m wide, below standard. It should be the standard 3.0m wide.

    The shared path on South Gyle Access is to be only 4m wide instead of the standard 5m. This is a pinch point as it goes under the railway and the tram line near a main junction of cycle routes, so it should be wider. The design will create a tight space at the NW corner of the junction, under the tram bridge, where cyclists heading eastwards along Quiet Route 8 will be waiting to cross the constricted 2-stage crossing of South Gyle Access (which looks unchanged from its present awful state) so causing conflict with cyclists heading north-south along the new link, not to mention pedestrians as well. One of the five traffic lanes should be removed to give more space for active travel.

    At Wester Hailes Plaza the cycle way crosses a high-speed slip road leading from Wester Hailes Road to the shopping centre car park, with cars coming fast on the blind side of southbound cyclists; this will have to be re-drawn so that vehicles going into the car park have to slow down before reaching the crossing. At the exit from the car park it looks as though southbound cyclists are expected to cross Harvester's Way twice; we would prefer the cycle route kept to the east side of Harvester's Way, omitting the cycle link into Wester Hailes Road (I can't see why a cyclist would want to use it, uphill with fast heavy traffic and no destinations, when there is a perfectly good quiet street running parallel).
    There is a similar awkwardly-angled slip road at the entrance to Sighthill Industrial Estate; we would like it removed with vehicles entering the Estate further along Calder Road, where the exit is.

    Links outside the area

    The route should be designed to make it easy to add future connections with places outside the immediate area:

    Across Queensferry Road to Cramond and National Cycle Route 1 at Braepark
    Across Maybury Road to the proposed developments in West Craigs and Cammo (particularly important for school children going from there to Craigmount High School)
    Across Drum Brae to Clermiston and north Corstorphine
    To the schools at Craigmount, St Augustine's and Forrester
    To the Gyle Centre and Hermiston Gait
    To the canal at Cultins Road
    To the Water of Leith path.

    Shopping centres

    The route does not make it any easier to reach the shopping centres at Gyle and Hermiston Gait, both of which are hard to reach by bicycle.

    At Gyle there are links to the edge of the centre, at least from the east and north-west, but then cyclists have to go through the car park to reach the shops and the cycle parking. A proper cycle route past Gyle Centre would also help to make a through route from Edinburgh Park to the path beside the A8; a route may be possible by the service road round the north side of the Gyle Centre, although that would not help to reach the Centre's main entrance. If a route through the Centre is difficult, the proposed railway bridge at Gogarloch Syke would allow another option to reach the A8 path, by using the south footway of Glasgow Road to reach the underpass at Edinburgh Gateway Station, making a route from South Gyle to Gogarburn without crossing a main road.

    Hermiston Gait is fairly easy to reach going north, but difficult going south because of the oneway restriction on Cultins Road. There should be a two-way cycle route along the west side of Cultins Road, which would also make it easier to reach the canal from the north.

    Other points

    Crossings of main roads should be single-stage rather than two-stage. If a crossing must be twostage, the central island should be large enough to accommodate several cyclists using the crossing at once (for example, at school leaving times). If the crossing of the A8 at Dechmont Road has to remain two-stage, the layout should be re-jigged so that cyclists do not have to dismount to reach the push buttons on the central island.

    Where side roads cross segregated cycle paths, there should be priority for cyclists at the junctions and adequate signs to make motorists aware that the cycle path has priority. Corner radii should be reduced to slow down traffic entering and leaving the side roads. This is particularly relevant in South Gyle Crescent and Bankhead Avenue.

    The Maybury Drive segregated path should be extended further south to allow cyclists to avoid Maybury Drive when heading to or from Mearenside and Hayfield.
    The route along Bughtlin Market mixes cyclists with parking and turning traffic and passes uncomfortably close to the front doors of East Craigs Church and the Medical Practice. We would prefer it to go along the more direct, wider, and traffic-free path past East Craigs Nursery School.

    Craigs Road is used by a lot of traffic to avoid queues at the Maybury junction, particularly in the morning peak, which is also the time children are heading to Craigmount High School. We would like traffic reduction measures in Craigs Road, by closing it to motor traffic (or making it one-way westwards) at the Maybury Road end, with an exemption for cycles and buses. Other suburban streets on the Link route should also have measures put in to discourage their use by through motor traffic.

    At the eastern end of South Gyle Crescent the Link route is shown heading north to the South Gyle Access roundabout and then south again. We would like to see it going through the Clocktower Business Park, cutting that corner.

    Good signage is essential as it will be easy for someone not familiar with the area to find themselves lost, particularly in the suburban areas without segregated cycle routes.

    Consultation survey
    consultationhub.edinburgh.gov.uk/sfc/wel-concept.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  21. acsimpson
    Member

    That seems like a pretty comprehensive reply, coving all the main points.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  22. HankChief
    Member

    So the Gyle have resubmitted their plans for a cinema complex at the front of their centre...

    https://citydev-portal.edinburgh.gov.uk/idoxpa-web/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=PSD8WCEWHUP00

    Disappointingly they have done nothing to improve the connectivity for cycling across their car park, despite this be a clear piece of feedback from their previous application.

    The A8 underpass is destined to be a route to the edge of their car park :-(

    Posted 4 years ago #
  23. HankChief
    Member

    Anyone else get the outcome from the initial consultation emailed to them...

    I did but don't know how to make it visible to the all-powerful shadowy cycling lobby (any offers to host it...)

    Posted 4 years ago #
  24. CycleAlex
    Member

    Send it over...

    Posted 4 years ago #
  25. chrisfl
    Member

    I got a copy, I've put it up here: /files/2019/WestEdinburghLink_Consultation_report_v2.0.pdf

    Posted 4 years ago #
  26. chdot
    Admin

    When asked how people would like to travel assuming they had the opportunity to do so, the analysis shows that

    Out of the 133 who travel by car to work,100 would change the way they do, with 24 responses for walking, 48 responses for cycling and 36 for public transport.

    Even allowing for an unrepresentative sample and an element of ‘telling surveyors what they want to hear’ this is a significant sign of latent demand/complete failure of public policies/action.

    Demonstrates the complete inadequacy of latest SG report.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  27. toomanybikes
    Member

    Someone I know said drivers in his gyle office were unhappy with the plans to remove parking on South gyle crescent (probably the 21 strong opposers in table 3.)

    I counted the parked cars on Google maps in all the full spaces on the southside of the South Gyle Crescent at 69 ignoring the 2 illegally parked cars

    Using the average occupancy for cars in Edinburgh (1.25- which is overly generous for commuters), if it induced at least 86 new cyclists it'd be a net benefit. That's a crazy low bar. I was expecting a figure more like 300. Jesus on-road parking is inefficient

    Posted 4 years ago #
  28. acsimpson
    Member

    @toomanybikes. How many people work within walking distance of those parking spaces. I wouldn't be surprised if it was more than 10,000 meaning the 69 spaces even with 86 occupants can't even get 1% of the staff into the area.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  29. neddie
    Member

    From my experience of working there a long time ago, the road is used as overspill parking and for those that want to "get away quickly" without queuing to get out of their company carpark at 17 hundred hours precisely.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  30. CycleAlex
    Member

    Some more drop-ins focusing on the public realm in each area:

    Bughtlin Market Shops: outside the shops Thursday 5 Sept 2pm – 7pm
    Gogarloch Park: Greenspace beside Gogarloch Syke Monday 9 Sept 4pm – 8pm
    Wester Hailes Road at Sighthill Road Wednesday 11 Sept 11am – 2pm
    Murrayburn Road at Canal Wednesday 11 Sept 3pm – 7pm
    Clovenstone Community Centre Thursday 12 Sept 2pm – 7pm

    Posted 4 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin