CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » General Edinburgh

“Lothian Buses chief wants extended bus lane hours to fight congestion”

(28 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    Edinburgh is being strangled by a “huge circle of congestion”, the head of its main bus operator has warned council leaders.

    Lothian Buses managing director Richard Hall said 
buses must be given greater priority to help ease the gridlock.

    He said the capital’s evening rush hour was now starting as early as 1pm and lasting up to six hours.

    https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/lothian-buses-chief-wants-extended-bus-lane-hours-to-fight-congestion-1-4649273

    Think the last paragraph overstates the case, but good that LB wants more bus priority, which should improve things for people on bikes.

    Presume they will be against the proposal to remove lane from Leith Street.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  2. gembo
    Member

    Evening rush hour 1pm? Maybe on a Friday?

    However, very good that the MD of LB is sayings this.

    Perhaps the council should return to fining drivers of cars in bus lanes? It is a big income generator but a potential vote loser of course.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  3. Nelly
    Member

    "Perhaps the council should return to fining drivers of cars in bus lanes?"

    Does this not happen now? Or is it only the lanes with cameras that are "policed"?

    Cars parked in bus lanes should be destroyed, IMO :-)

    Posted 7 years ago #
  4. jonty
    Member

    I would argue that in many cases parking in bus lanes is worse than driving in them. At least driving cars move.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  5. ejstubbs
    Member

    I have never understood why red routes have parking & loading spaces marked in them. Seems to completely undermine the principle of having a stretch of road that no-one is allowed to obstruct.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  6. gibbo
    Member

    MacInnes:

    "To reduce congestion we need to get more people to choose public transport as the better option – for themselves, for the city and for those who need to move quickly and easily on our roads."

    At least she seems to understand the equation: that to encourage bus use, buses have to be faster than cars.

    The question is whether she has the willingness and ability to do something about it.

    The obvious first step would be a congestion charge, but that would violate the council's belief that all drivers should be allowed to drive on any road, in any direction, at any time, free of charge.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  7. chdot
    Admin

    “At least she seems to understand the equation: that to encourage bus use, buses have to be faster than cars.”

    That’ll never happen unless there are more places cars can’t go (like Princes Street).

    “The question is whether she has the willingness and ability to do something about it.”

    Indeed.

    There are other factors that would make a difference to (encouraging more) people to use buses Oyster-style payment and consequently bus transfer without buying a new ticket. LB always says ‘most people use DayTickets or weekly/monthly passes. Perhaps but still no reason for not having a fast/easy payment method.

    “The obvious first step would be a congestion charge, but that would violate the council's belief that all drivers should be allowed to drive on any road, in any direction, at any time, free of charge.”

    Not really the Council’s belief (as such). Most politicians fear upsetting motorists. Stuck with the outdated notions which seem to be ‘only motorists vote’ and ‘voters care about driving more than anything else’.

    But really it’s an issue that SG should just get on with - with the conviction that’s behind minimum alcohol pricing and (previously) smoking bans.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  8. neddie
    Member

    IMO, the obvious first step would be to prevent cross-town journeys by private motors. AKA filtered permeability.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  9. chdot
    Admin

  10. gembo
    Member

    @nelly, bus lane violation rarely enforced. Except last time when the income generated from just five roads was quite sizeable.

    For me single occupant vehicles comprise almost all rush hour journeys. I don't mind drivers doing this but they should be made to pay for this privilege via congestion charge.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  11. hunnymonster
    Member

    Making the bus lanes 7am to 7pm, 7 days per week would be a good thing. At the last bus lane consultation CEC solicited views when they reduced the operating hours... Flying in the face of their own presumption in favour of public transport & active travel... Made not a jot of difference between by having the policy nor the consultation.

    Even carmageddon Glasgow operates bus lanes 7-7/7!

    Posted 7 years ago #
  12. chdot
    Admin

  13. Murun Buchstansangur
    Member

    I see, of course it's all the fault of everyone except drivers.

    Mr Allan better hope politicians ignore the ravings of his own ilk and improve public transport or he'll end up deeply regretting that purchase of a newbuild box on the very outskirts of town next to a humungous retail park.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  14. gembo
    Member

    APB APB

    mr Allan of hopper gardens newcraighall appears to have lost his faculties

    Posted 7 years ago #
  15. Frenchy
    Member

    The sheer number of users cause their own congestion in large parts of the city centre.

    He's so (accidentally) close to being right he should be able to taste it.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  16. crowriver
    Member

    Mr Allan writes: "yet another ban on our freedoms"...

    I smell the blood of a Daily Mail reading, Brexit voting, Tory sympathiser (or even party member). Next he'll be frothing about the Nanny State and punitive tax rises for higher earners...

    Posted 7 years ago #
  17. gibbo
    Member

    Mr Allan writes: "yet another ban on our freedoms"...

    "Our" doesn't seem to include people who use public transport.

    Drivers don't seem to understand that a reduction in vehicles on the road would make driving better.

    So, unless the freedom you most care about is the freedom to be stuck in a traffic jam ...

    Posted 7 years ago #
  18. gembo
    Member

    When we go down south we use the toll road to avoid Birmingham. Costs £5.80 roads are empty though seeds are fierce. The actual tollroad is quite short but it cuts a corner and the road after it heading south east always seems like part of the cost. Mr A would you pay? Or is it every driver's right to drive where they like for free. E.g. Straight to the traffic jam?

    Posted 7 years ago #
  19. chdot
    Admin

    My bold.

    Bus lane operation times were reduced only a couple of years ago after it was demonstrated that for long periods during the day they were almost devoid of buses, yet cars and lorries were being held up in traffic jams in the adjacent lanes.

    Motorists are citizens too and their views have to be taken into account. It is all very well for Mr Hall to seek to advance his company’s interests but not at the expense of people who choose not to use public transport and prefer to use their cars.

    That is their right and if the desired aim is to reduce car use then motorists should be persuaded of the benefits and not forced to use public transport by making their lives more difficult.

    https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/opinion/steve-cardownie-bus-lane-hours-extension-not-the-route-to-go-1-4649632

    Posted 7 years ago #
  20. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Why are councilors writing articles without disclosing that they are councilors? Surely of some relevance?

    Posted 7 years ago #
  21. chdot
    Admin

    He’s ex.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  22. Morningsider
    Member

    There are 1385km of roads in Edinburgh. The bus lane network is 65km long. Lothian buses has a fleet of 721 vehicles, while there are 163,500 cars and vans licensed in the city. 121,000,000 trips were made on Lothian Buses in 2015. Given average Scottish car occupancy of 1.5 people, that's 80.7 million car trips taken off the city's roads in a year.

    If buses were to truly pay the price for their impact on congestion, the bus lane network would have to be extended to many times its current length and hours of operation extended.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  23. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    He’s ex.

    Good.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  24. Ed1
    Member

    The bus also competes with walking many of the trips may be walks taken of the road or some cycle journeys. Also the bus hops may be recorded as separate trips when a car journey as one trip, if get a bus to Leith have to change bus so counts as 2 bus trips yet would be one car trip.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  25. gembo
    Member

    I thought Steve cardownie was pro bus. He voted agin the trams citing his preference for buses. Now he is all for motors. He does change his mind a bit, e,.g. He was labour then SNP etc

    Posted 7 years ago #
  26. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    He was labour then SNP etc

    Wikipedia claims he was SSP first. Foxy rolls in a big Merc as you know.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  27. gembo
    Member

    Foxy needs to pack his sound system in a big boot.

    Gembo: Cannae hear ye Foxy, turn it on

    Foxy: Sorry sir it wears out the batteries if I put it on

    Posted 7 years ago #
  28. crowriver
    Member

    Is that the same ex-Cllr Cardownie who is/was a partner in a city taxi/private hire firm?

    Vested interest much?

    This thread may be of interest:

    http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7270

    Posted 7 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin