CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

Today's Good Justice...

(13 posts)
  • Started 6 years ago by morepathsplease
  • Latest reply from paddyirish

Tags:


  1. morepathsplease
    Member

    Haven't found a similar thread and not expecting much to be added to this but it helps to see that potential road victims are thought about on occasion at least (until appeal perhaps).

    Driver banned for crashing into bathroom.

    Ludden, from Morfa Nefyn, argued he should avoid a driving ban as it would impact on the life of his disabled son, but magistrates said they had to protect the public.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  2. Frenchy
    Member

    You missed the best(worst?) bit - "A man has been banned from driving after crashing his car into the first floor of a house in Gwynedd."

    Article has a photo.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  3. morepathsplease
    Member

    The bathroom was at street level so not the extreme incident you might imagine (sad that I don't consider it extreme as is). Unfortunately, it's the consideration for potential victims that seems extreme.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  4. Luath
    Member

    It's the impact on his son of allowing to keep driving that he should be worried about.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  5. Stickman
    Member

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/23/company-director-used-laser-jammer-could-escape-fines-giving/

    This made me laugh. 8 months. Serves the ***** right.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  6. gembo
    Member

    Drives past cameras on three occasions uses jammer to reduce speed to zero and gives police the middle finger = police suggesting this is an excellent way to attract their attention and go to jail.

    Cocaine thinking has made it to 67 year olds in rural north Yorks?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  7. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Gammon thinking.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  8. Mandopicker101
    Member

    Comments on that Torygraph piece are eyeopening.

    Minor lawbreaking by respectable people (speeding, perverting course of justice, insulting the police etc) is generally ok. Police expending taxpayer's money pursuing respectable/decent people for 'soft' offences (speeding, perversion of course of justice etc) is assuredly not ok.

    What an interesting worldview.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  9. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Have we stumbled on the Gammon King?

    Posted 6 years ago #
  10. unhurt
    Member

    @Mandopicker101 wonder how they feel about minor law breaking by non respectable people? I suspect they are not a fan of letting them alone.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  11. ejstubbs
    Member

    A number of participants on this forum seemed to be propounding the idea that 'minor' law breaking by ~100 car drivers a day using the FRB was not worth pursuing.

    Posted 6 years ago #
  12. gembo
    Member

    His face was 100% Gammon when flipping the cops the bird

    @ejstubbs - I thought the gist was whilst we think this well worth pursuing, the cops will not bother but then reports came in from the Bridge that the cops were taking action.

    I have taken this up with the cop in charge of the bridge and will get back to y'all

    Posted 6 years ago #
  13. paddyirish
    Member

    @ejstubbs

    not condoning breaking the law at all, but stating my belief that this particular law is an ass, as I don't believe there is a potential victim.

    If a dangerous biking law was passed would you be similarly dismissive of anyone who stated that it was an ass?

    Posted 6 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin