Try this:
https://www.facebook.com/EdinburghPoliceDivision/posts/2252754898314013
The EEN article is basically a re-written version.
I'm so pleased that the police have reminded me of my place as a 'vulnerable road user' (because I'm not driving) - and that I need to 'take the utmost care'. I'd not have thought of that when crossing the road tomorrow - but better safe than sorry I guess.
Do you think that there are various public authorities who genuinely believe that their role is to make the world safer by telling us all to be more careful. Do they think that out here in the real world we're just awaiting such advice - that they are the wise ones and that people get hurt just because they aren't clever enough to know that a car running into you, or that a collision between someone cycling and someone walking, is going to hurt.
How is it, for instance, that for decades and decades there's been money to send people into schools and to write booklets and advice, telling kids to wear bright yellow (etc) clothing just to walk to school. Nobody has ever dressed their kids up in bright yellow just to walk to school. Nobody does it now. Probably nobody will do it in future. Yet someone is employed on the basis that telling kids to do the thing they aren't going to do is a 'good thing'.
Maybe we could fight back as so....
Edinburgh's City Cycling Forum tonight issued an official warning to UK state and local authorities, reminding them of the need not to say stupid things. A spokesperson from the forum said "too often our public authorities decide to blame the victims of crime, or to build advice on stereotypes and blatant stupidity, and we'd always advise them not to do that, because victims don't like being blamed for the bad stuff that happens to them, or being stereotyped, and frankly saying stupid things just so that you feel like you're doing something has the side effect of making you look stupid."