CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

Greenbank to Meadows Quiet Route (Inc Braid Road/Estate)

(707 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    “I'd be looking for a refund”

    That’s seriously good suggestion.

    Posted 20 hours ago #
  2. chdot
    Admin

  3. chdot
    Admin

    Short thread with useful details

    https://bsky.app/profile/edi.bike/post/3mlo366qgtc2s?ref=edinburghminute.com

    Posted 10 hours ago #
  4. chdot
    Admin

  5. neddie
    Member

    Clearly the (E)TRO system isn't fit for purpose

    There should also be a presumtion in favour of active travel added to the legislation - so that roads can easily be changed to make it easier to install walking, cycling and low-traffic infra, with a very high bar to cross for any objectors. Conversely, if parking or loading are to be added, there should be a rigorous process and justification to do that.

    Posted 8 hours ago #
  6. neddie
    Member

    A second similar Edinburgh Live article, with more quotes:

    https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/our-edinburgh-childrens-safe-route-33931077

    BTW, none of the people there were "furious" - the press asked us all not to smile, FFS

    Posted 8 hours ago #
  7. neddie
    Member

  8. gembo
    Member

    Ha, wee joked that we would be described as FURIOUS

    Posted 7 hours ago #
  9. chdot
    Admin

    First one looks a bit furious

    https://www.facebook.com/reel/990737010340588

    Posted 7 hours ago #
  10. chdot
    Admin

    Asked if there was "absolutely no way" the measures affected by the wording errors could be retained, she said: "We are not aware of any way we can retain them."

    However, following the sub-committee decision, Morningside Green councillor Ben Parker said he believed the council's transport committee had the power to correct the wording and make the measures legal.

    https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/edinburgh-roads-call-for-urgent-meeting-of-transport-committee-to-correct-mistakes-and-save-controversial-traffic-filters-8542364

    Posted 4 hours ago #
  11. gembo
    Member

    Pussycat

    Posted 4 hours ago #
  12. neddie
    Member

    An update from Blackford Safe Routes:

    https://blackfordsaferoutes.co.uk/braid-estate-and-whitehouse-loan/

    Posted 3 hours ago #
  13. chdot
    Admin

    Was just about to post that link!

    Thank you to everyone who wrote to councillors about the traffic filters outside the school! Your emails made a difference, and we’re delighted to say that the council voted to make the filters on Whitehouse Loan permanent – the one outside James Gillespie’s Primary school, as well as the one at Strathearn Road.

    Rest worth a read too

    Posted 3 hours ago #
  14. bakky
    Member

    I have seen official confirmation / comms that it's now a full report coming to TEC on 18th June instead of the promised/minor Business Bulletin item.

    Posted 3 hours ago #
  15. pringlis
    Member

    That's positive at least. I had been hopeful they can pull the date forward but at least this gives officials time to actually form a plan, I imagine it was a mad scramble preparing for the TRO Sub. Still going to be an interesting timing challenge with the 6 month fallow period, and then a 6 month consultation period that will likely clash with council elections.

    Posted 2 hours ago #
  16. neddie
    Member

    If they do a permanent TRO, there should be only 3 weeks for objections. No need to do another consultation

    Posted 2 hours ago #
  17. chdot
    Admin

    “and then a 6 month consultation period“

    Perhaps some of our new MSPs (especially the ones who are still Cllrs) could whizz through a useful amendment banning perpetual consultations…

    Perhaps not

    Posted 2 hours ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin