To those calling for more consultation:
A practical trial of the Quiet Route is a form of consultation. And it is a more accessible way of consulting, because everyone can see how it works.
We've already had clear examples of what happens when democratic processes (i.e. endless consultations) are used against progressive movements e.g the Edward Coulston statue getting pulled down.
People had tried for years to get a plaque in place and had trusted the system. Democracy mustn't be used to prevent progress - that is an abuse of democracy.
Consultation can be used as an abuse of democracy - that is what some councillors, MSPs, MPs are doing. And they need to be called-out on that and made to feel uncomfortable.
It is important for councillors to see that society needs and wants democratic processes to improve the city, nobody wants people to be so frustrated with the system that direct action is seen as the only alternative. For moderate parties, it should be a no-brainer that a trial is a moderate approach to progress.
The statue pulling and XR protests are all due to frustration with the democratic process.
And here's the rub:
Those calling for "more consultation" can never be satisfied. They will always claim that such-and-such "wasn't consulted", or, "nobody got in touch with me directly to ask my opinion", until every last human on the planet has been consulted.
This is a form of individualistic, neo-liberal behaviour, where an individual's opinion matters more than the collective good.
In that regard, parties calling for more consultation are the ones presenting themselves as the neo-liberal extremists...