So, I should know better, but I got drawn into an argument on a local FaceBook group (I know, I know...)
The argument revolves around a couple of local folk complaining about parents and children walking on a roadway to and from our local primary school. The section of road in question is not a through route - it is bollarded at one end, is quite narrow, and the pavement is only 1m wide at each side (Top of Silverknowes Road, approaching Main Street, if you know Davidson's Mains). The locals are complaining about not being able to drive past groups of peds spread out across the road.
I've been arguing on the basis on patience and tolerance in view of the pandemic primarily (to very little effect), but it did set me thinking about the legal situation here. The Highway Code is silent on this, I think, although it does tend to assume pedestrians will usually be on pavements (sensibly enough for the most part, of course). In this situation though, where there is restricted space, I was assuming that peds are road users with all the rights that implies, and drivers are legally obliged to drive with due care and attention around them (that's in the RTA, I think?), but there is no legal basis for asserting priority of car over ped (just as there would be no priority of bus over car, or articulated lorry over bus)?
Anyway, I wondered if wiser heads than I knew the contours of the legal position here?