“A lovely illustration of the absurdity of these transport awards“
And many award processes - some of which have had more scrutiny in recent years, not least some transparency of ‘who can vote’.
Suntrans has a long history of being both bold and challenging but also cautious (they may say pragmatic).
They have overcome many obstacles with objections from locals, landowners and councils.
In some areas it was ‘barriers or no path’. Whether some were (or still are on some walking routes) illegal is a different matter.
In places there was excess paranoia about motor bikes (in a few places concerns were justified) and all sorts of barriers were devised that included metal boxes with gates (for prams and wheelchairs!) and also gaps with a special bar at pedal height.
Locally these were mostly done by LRC rather than Sustrans.
Probably the most comical was (planned but never constructed) on the landing halfway down the set of steps from Ferry Road to Goldenacre Path.
Most obstructions have been removed in Edinburgh, however the array of bollards around Five Ways shows that there are still ‘problems’ (cars rather than bikes the reason here).
Another real problem for Sustrans is that (not unreasonably) some people assume that anywhere there is a blue sign there is ownership and responsibility. One or both may not be the case.
Perhaps ‘Sustrans’ should have been/be split into two (perhaps completely separate) organisations. One in charge of maintaining and expanding ‘The Network’ and another doing advocacy and lobbying.
How the latter would ‘mesh’ with Cycling UK, Cycling Scotland, transform
scotland, Living Streets, Ramblers, etc is perhaps more of a problem than an opportunity…
It might be good to have a standalone (independent?!) version in Scotland.
But…