"It is perfectly legal to park there"
- at certain times of the day.
That is key to the 'problem'.
It would be nice if more cycle lanes were 'protected' by double yellows. There are probably a few that really ought to be. ('We' can argue about that and produce a good list.)
The Mound is obviously a possibility.
BUT it comes back to what the roads are "for" and what 'we' think they should be for and what politicians/council officials think the majority of voters want or (not very often unfortunately) what they ought to want!
There are certain basic assumptions - some of which should be challenged more often.
****
Traffic should "flow"
and be helped to flow
Parking should be restricted during 'rush' hour so that people can get to work more easily
Some places need to allow short term parking for deliveries
Some places need parking for the benefit of shops
All sorts of assumptions are made about the necessity/price/times of parking to discourage commuters, encourage city centre commerce (etc.) - some of these conflict with other alleged aims such as encouraging Public Transport and cycling
Cars must be accommodated as much as possible (it would seem)
People who cycle are a minority - and always will be
Even if Edinburgh is to become a world class cycling city the car/bike/pedestrian balance won't change much
etc.
****
There are 'part day' bus lanes (which confuse motorists so they tend to stay out of them all day).
There are 'part day' bike lanes which don't confuse motorists...
I think 'we' are therefore complaining about "part day bike lanes". It is clearly a bit dishonest to add these to the 'plus list' of 'miles of cycle lanes' (I think they also include the bus lanes).
It is probably a waste of money to make them red!
IF 'rush hour' traffic continues to get favoured, then even part time bike lanes must be beneficial (as long as the no parking is enforced - which is another issue!). A LOT could be done to address the various issues about "necessity/price/times of parking", but...
To some extent the problem isn't about parking on bike lanes (it's not as though they are neatly continuous when not parked on!) The bigger problems relate to "road space" - and, particularly, the way it is shared and also the attitude of vehicle drivers to cyclists.
If there are cars parked (legally) on bike lanes then it might seem reasonable for 'drivers' to 'understand' why bikes are on the road in front of them. UNFORTUNATELY too many people who drive don't seem to be rational - plus (quite reasonably) they don't see themselves as part of a 'motorist tribe' so that when some of their fellows are being allowed to park on cycle lanes they should give up a bit of time/space to the bike in front.
It's unfortunate that we have a UK Government that made a big deal of 'ending the war on motorists' (not that previous governments were any better).
Edinburgh really needs to have a convincing transport strategy that it is willing to take a lead on that addresses the needs/desires of residents/visitors and favours people - pedestrians/cyclists/drivers more than vehicles.
It's perfectly reasonable to want to get to work/shops/etc but perhaps less reasonable to take your car too. Or at least pay a more realistic price for doing so. OOH that sounds like an argument for Congestion Charging - which Edinburgh residents voted against...