CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

Council budgets for 5%

(37 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    Spokes has been busy studying the details of today's CEC Budget -

    "

    Edinburgh City councillors have taken a remarkable decision on cycling investment in today’s Council 2012/13 budget, setting a completely new standard for other councils…

    The council decided today that 5% of its transport capital budget will be invested in cycling infrastructure and projects [p19 of budget motion, 1.7MB] – and this is quite apart from additional ‘external’ funding. To our knowledge, no other Scottish council has set a percentage for cycling, let alone such an ambitious figure.

    "

    http://www.spokes.org.uk/wordpress/2012/02/edinburgh-sets-new-standard/

    Posted 12 years ago #
  2. Kirst
    Member

    Let's hope they don't display the same competence they've put to such good use on the trams project.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  3. Claggy Cog
    Member

    This is good news, non? Let's hope that it doesn't get rescinded after May 3rd, with a new set of councillors. Is this a vote grabber? Have they realised that cyclist votes count? Perhaps they have been reading the other posts about TE projects creating more jobs etc...

    Posted 12 years ago #
  4. Instography
    Member

    It's one of those classic situations I'm sure Lenin had something to say about where you can praise them unequivocally today and restart the campaign for more tomorrow.

    I have a nice map in the office that estimates the level of cycling for every neighbourhood in Scotland. In Edinburgh it shows where cycling is concentrated and where it is depressingly low. Could be a good basis for some targeted campaigning around funding and facilities if I knew someone who could use it.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  5. Kim
    Member

    That is more like it! Now all we have to do is get the rest of the country to follow suit!!

    Posted 12 years ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

    @Instography map sounds interesting. Can it be put on-line (the Edinburgh bit at least)?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  7. Instography
    Member

    Dunno. It's a big file if you want to be able to see it. I'll try sending it to my Flickr account and see how it looks.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  8. Dave
    Member

    Hmm. I can't believe they're doing it for a non-cynical reason, so what could that be? Are the lib-dems seeing the writing on the wall in these parts?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  9. Morningsider
    Member

    This is incredible - if you read what hs actually been agreed, it is even better than reported by SPOKES:

    "Council agrees that the percentage of transport spend (net of specifically allocated external transport funding) allocated to cycling shall be a minimum
    of 5%, for both revenue and capital, in 2012/13 and that the percentage of spend on cycling will increase by 1% annually"

    So, 5% of revenue AND capital - and rising by 1% per year! Bravo City of Edinburgh Council - I think we should congratulate our Councillors on this, after all we are always quick to complain when things go wrong. We have to prove there is some political benefit to them doing this.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  10. SRD
    Moderator

    Wonder if kaputnik could come up with something suitably uncynical and we could send all our councillors a big thank you! (after all, we are so quick to criticize them!)

    Posted 12 years ago #
  11. ruggtomcat
    Member

    congratulatory tweet sent!

    Posted 12 years ago #
  12. SRD
    Moderator

    I have sent email to my councillors and also to Gordon Mackenzie. let's give them some positive feedback!

    Posted 12 years ago #
  13. chdot
    Admin

  14. SRD
    Moderator

    Quick and nice reply from GM:

    "Thanks [SRD], getting that through was really satisfying - of the Councillors you have [Craiglockhart/Fountainbridge] only Cllr Lowrie voted for it. Hopefully the others will follow suit in their election manifesto."

    This is email I sent to my councillors:

    "The decision to allocate 5% of the transport budget to cycling is well-chosen, but also very brave. Well done all of you who supported it. Many thanks for listening to all of us who want to help make Edinburgh a healthier city to live in, and a great place for our
    children to grow up in."

    Posted 12 years ago #
  15. Min
    Member

    Is there any way to find out who voted for it and who didn't? It would be nice to target a little.

    "Great that this has gone through. Sorry that you didn't feel able to vote for it on this occasion" :-P

    Posted 12 years ago #
  16. chdot
    Admin

    "Is there any way to find out who voted for it and who didn't? It would be nice to target a little."

    Basically a straight coalition v other parties split on whole budget.

    So no-one specifically voted against.

    Good idea to send message to those who appear to 'oppose'!

    "
    Dear

    You voted against...

    I hope you are in favour of a higher percentage...

    "

    Posted 12 years ago #
  17. LaidBack
    Member

    Pleased that pressure has had a result. Thanks to those who have been part of the process.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  18. kaputnik
    Moderator

    I think the cooncil spies were reading my post where I said I'd vote for any party that pegged cycling budget at just 2%.

    But finally perhaps this is the goods neccessary to begin delivering on that old "world class cycling city" chestnut.

    Let's now all be on our guards to ensure this isn't spent on bollards, chicanes and "cyclists dismount" signs for existing paths and is spent upgrading the substandard (i.e. non-surfaced) routes, restoring infrastructure ruined by the tram shenanigans and building new and safer routes, particularly in the city centre and to places of work and to schools to encourage less car journeys for pleasure, the "school run" and commuting.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  19. Dave
    Member

    I've sent a congratulatory write-to-them email. What a great site, I'm really getting into it!

    Posted 12 years ago #
  20. Kim
    Member

    We should all use writetothem.com to send a message of support to our Councillors to show that this move has popular support. Also to make them aware they will actually make a positive change with this money. Crap infrastructure is not acceptable, the times they are a changing.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  21. Cyclingmollie
    Member

    Kim: "That is more like it! Now all we have to do is get the rest of the country to follow suit!!"

    I think I might send a letter to my councillor to point out how pathetic East Lothian Council's £50,000 budget for cycling looks in comparison. That they still do stuff like this only makes me keener.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  22. Kim
    Member

    Might also be worth pointing out some of the resent changes in Glasgow. Lets face it this could be a greater spur to action than anything else, we can't let Glasgow be better than us... ;-)

    Posted 12 years ago #
  23. Min
    Member

    My god that looks horrible. Particularly at the side streets where as I suspected (from one of the comments), drivers just don't give way. :-(

    "There are a number of problems with this route that users have found, namely the cycle track priority at the Berkeley St/Claremont St Give Way junction is ignored by motorists and some collisions have resulted,"

    Posted 12 years ago #
  24. LaidBack
    Member

    My current challenge is 'can we link NCN 1' to the Meadows? Routes with wheelie bins and railings don't count! The tram blitz has curtailled any guided tours to Cramond....

    Posted 12 years ago #
  25. SRD
    Moderator

    'Obviously' NCN 1 should go around via south suburban, and connect to Russell Rd, with a spur off through meadows to city centre (although access via canal would make more sense).

    Posted 12 years ago #
  26. wingpig
    Member

    @Laidback How do you feel about cobbles and kerbs?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  27. Dave
    Member

    Laidback - I heard that someone in Claire's old office was looking into that very link. Unfortunately, because there is an obvious solution (move the pedestrian crossing up to encompass the whole junction and add a phase for crossing over) it won't happen.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  28. LaidBack
    Member

    Cobbles and kerbs... Crosscauseway has plenty of cobbles. The link to innocent path has been half completed in the usual half baked way bike routes are 'handled'. The toucan crossings are not aligned etc. One has a painetd route but cyclists have to cycle on the unmarked pavement.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  29. Arellcat
    Moderator

    If CEC holds to this redoubling of effort, it should be commended wholeheartedly.

    Remember, our little family of cycle infrastructure advisers has already done the cataloguing of areas for improvement!

    http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4466#post-47330

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps/ms?msid=209737842711828293504.0004b23ebd5637d894842&msa=0

    Posted 12 years ago #
  30. crowriver
    Member

    Where's that Google Map that some of us added to/annotated showing where improvements are needed? Oh yeah, here it is:

    http://g.co/maps/wn9pr

    Please add your suggestions here! The council could do with sorting that lot out to start with!

    Posted 12 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin