"
LOCAL ACTIVIST ILLUMINATES
Many readers will have occasionally observed contractors working upon sections of road or pavement, and wondered whether the scheme was strictly necessary. How was it prioritised, through which process, by whom and at what cost? Who got paid for the job?
The indefatigable Harald Tobermann of Pilrig is one of Broughton’s finest, sceptical members of the awkward squad, and has turned his attention to just such a case: the recent resurfacing of local backwater East Scotland Street Lane (optimistically glossed in Issue 196).
CEC officials were initially reluctant to answer his queries on costs and mechanisms. They suggested he should pay £60–80 for the information through Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 [http:// bit.ly/wGGR0W], even though such figures would be readily available – like any other contract figures – on a departmental database.
Tobermann persisted, began invoking the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 and the Scottish Information Commissioner, and eventually CEC relented. As a result, we can now reveal that the works cost £51,348, funded from the Road and Footway Capital Investment budget 2011/12. See Extras (1.2.12) for the full response.
Publication of even these straightforward but absurdly hard-to-access data represents a significant gain for civic transparency. It’s a first step. Tobermann now has the bone firmly between his teeth, and is gnawing on it.
"
http://broughtonspurtle.org.uk/sites/broughtonspurtle.org.uk/files/spurtle_203_high_quality.pdf