CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » General Edinburgh

Death rates prompt new traffic plans

(15 posts)

  1. cc
    Member

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/death-rates-prompt-new-traffic-plans.16877850

    "The council has identified areas for improvement, including the route from Haymarket to Holyrood, the Haymarket area, Chambers Street, The Royal Mile and Tollcross.

    The road to Holyrood would include prioritising pedestrians and bikes over cars, changing one-way systems in the Lothian Road area, and a vehicle-free access from the Grassmarket to the Union Canal.

    The Royal Mile would have greater restrictions on cars. Tollcross and areas towards the canal could have widespread pedestrianisation."

    Posted 12 years ago #
  2. chdot
    Admin

    This is most encouraging!

    It is likely that it's partly due to EU regulations on air pollution.

    I hope it includes Queen Street.

    No doubt there will be an 'outcry' by some people who fear that their 'human rights' will be infringed on.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  3. gembo
    Member

    and a vehicle-free access from the Grassmarket to the Union Canal.

    this could be part of the curious whin kerbing 175m on the Western Approach?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  4. chdot
    Admin

    "vehicle-free access from the Grassmarket to the Union Canal"

    That's quite a long bridge...

    Posted 12 years ago #
  5. wingpig
    Member

    I hope they don't just mean carrying bikes up through the vennel, through Quartermile, along NMW, up over Bruntsfield Links then across to a strip of red paint down Leamington Terrace, technically avoiding vehicles (with that last bit of red paint) but also avoiding convenience.
    I hope there'll be plenty of thought put into the interactions at the beginnings and ends of new facilities. Changes to the one-way.systems round Lothian Road would be helped with big signs indicating them well in advance to prevent people getting into them before discovering that they can't escape in the way they wish to.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

    "I hope they don't just mean carrying bikes up through the vennel"

    Agreed!

    Think I did that once - quite a slog!

    The intention might be to include a contra-flow on Lady Lawson Street. That's been 'coming' for 30 years.

    It was originally shelved because of objections from the Fire Brigade.

    That's when the active fire station was at Lauriston Place not West Tollcross...

    ThisisEdinburgh.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  7. cb
    Member

    There must certainly be scope to open up direct access from Lochrin Place to the canal.

    That would cut quite a large and busy 'corner'.

    Google satellite view still shows empty ground there, but perhaps I'm behind the curve and there are already some sparkly new flats in that space?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  8. chdot
    Admin

    "Google satellite view still shows empty ground there, but perhaps I'm behind the curve and there are already some sparkly new flats in that space?"

    Nope.

    There's a recession ya know...

    Pretty sure that a link here is/would be part of planning consent.

    I think site is still owned by http://www.macmic.co.uk

    In theory it would be possible to put a link through now, but I don't suppose anyone would think it was worth doing a 'temporary' path.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  9. crowriver
    Member

    I know the area around Haymarket has been the worst for air quality for some years: high traffic volumes, relatively low lying and sheltered from the wind. South Bridge, Cowgate etc. also not nice.

    Pretty sure there must be similar pollution issues in the north of the city centre too, eg. Easter Road, London Road, Leith Walk areas. Maybe the fresh breeze off the Forth and the wider roads (except Easter Rd) mitigate the effect of pollution somewhat?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  10. crowriver
    Member

    These reports make for interesting reading. The maps are very revealing as to the source of most pollution (motor vehicles):

    http://www.sepa.org.uk/air/air_publications.aspx

    Posted 12 years ago #
  11. SRD
    Moderator

    There was a front pager on the EEN a few years back, showing which places in Edin had worst air pollution. Leith St - London Rd are was one of (if not the) worst. (at that time, I walked through there twice every day!)

    Posted 12 years ago #
  12. crowriver
    Member

    Despite a slight improvement on the previous year, the level of nitrogen dioxide on busy roads such as London Road and St John's Road continues to put the city in line for EU fines.

    The EU annual average objective for nitrogen dioxide – which is not a greenhouse gas – is 40 micrograms per cubic metre. However, a number of the city's busiest roads regularly exceed this, including St John's Road and Morrison Street, where levels often exceed 70 micrograms

    The highest reading was taken on one part of St John's Road, where an annual mean concentration of 85 micrograms was recorded. Among the other worst offenders are West Port and West Maitland Street.

    From Scotsman, 2009:
    http://www.scotsman.com/news/city_air_quality_to_take_your_breath_away_1_1225038

    The next time you see traffic stopped at lights and there are several cars emitting copious exhaust next to a lone cyclist, you can be cheered by the fact that those in the car are experiencing the highest air pollution exposure, and not the cyclist. The air pollution in cars moving slowly in traffic can be up to ten times more concentrated than the levels outside in the street.

    From Scotsman, 2002: http://www.scotsman.com/news/time_to_clear_the_air_over_pollution_1_850038

    Road transport is the main cause of local air quality problems. There is a lack of coordination between air quality and transport objectives at both a national and a local level.

    and

    The majority of air quality problems in Scotland are related to emissions from road transport, in particular buses and heavy goods vehicles. For example, the City of Edinburgh Council found that buses contributed over 50 per cent of all emissions of nitrogen oxides at four of five sites monitored in the city centre in 2001.

    From 'Protecting and improving Scotland’s environment', Audit Scotland, prepared for the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission, January 2010:

    http://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/docs/central/2010/nr_100114_environment_overview.pdf

    Posted 12 years ago #
  13. chdot
    Admin

    "City of Edinburgh Council found that buses contributed over 50 per cent of all emissions of nitrogen oxides at four of five sites monitored in the city centre in 2001"

    This is one of the reasons Lothian Buses has spent so much money on 'greener' buses.

    It's also a reason for the tram, which may or may not be a cost effective way of improving urban air pollution.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  14. wingpig
    Member

    Back in 2001 the west footway on Waverley Bridge must have been quite bad too.

    Has anyone on here ever reported a Lothian Bus to LRT purely on emissions grounds after finding themselves behind one emitting FirstBus levels of exhaust-filth?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  15. slowcoach
    Member

    This seems to be the report the Herald is referring to. Some of the measures listed in the Herald have already been proposed/agreed elsewhere eg the Active Travel Action Plan (ATAP).

    It might help show serious traffic problems are if we could compare how many early deaths traffic pollution causes/contributes to, compared with those from traffic collisions??

    Posted 12 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin