Went to my second community council meeting last night , and just as at first one, as soon as the police mentioned bike theft as an issue, a chorus rose up from the members about cyclists on pavements being the real problem, in the context of the canal path (see this thread for more on this) there were complaints about people riding too fast under bridges, and someone told about 'someone's dog being run over', and people complained about cyclists not ringing bells etc.
I decided to stay quiet - for the most part - and am contemplating writing to the Chair to ask for a proper debate -- while we all agree that riders on pavements, too fast on canal path etc are a problem, I find it really frustrating that the Councillors are so resistant to even considering cyclists as victims of theft (all cases reported while bikes locked in stairwells), and so immediately turn the debate. Do they really _every month_ encounter this many cyclists on pavements that it must be brought up again and again? The police also asked for the council to highlight three problems in the area that we want tackled, which they would then prioritize, and I can just imagine that these will be cyclists and graffiti, which basically seems to criminalize all cyclists by implication (and teenagers).
I know from previous threads that not all community councils are so anti-bike. Does anyone have any suggestions for how to try to stimulate a more productive discussion, which does not just automatically revert to 'pavement, bells, too fast' etc?