CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Computers, GPS, 'Smart' 'Phones

Graphing your gear inches

(9 posts)
  • Started 11 years ago by Dave
  • Latest reply from Cyclingmollie

No tags yet.


  1. Dave
    Member

    You need a GPS / phone type device with a cadence sensor for this to work.
    I just posted a step-by-step guide to graphing gear inches by time or distance on my blog. It comes out with stuff like this (for a 200km brevet):

    For instance, it shows I shouldn't worry much about gearing over 90" on a future brevet bike (but want to get the range from 60-85" on a single chainring if possible). :thumbsup:

    Posted 11 years ago #
  2. cb
    Member

    Quite interesting that, although I confess to skim reading most of the Excel stuff. I've sometimes wondered how much I use each gear.

    Could you regraph it showing distance by gear? That would presumably push the peak towards the right?

    Posted 11 years ago #
  3. Uberuce
    Member

    I've followed the guide for wee blue floofy, but it keeps coming out as a single vertical line.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  4. Dave
    Member

    Is that because it has one gear? ;-)

    Posted 11 years ago #
  5. wee folding bike
    Member

    Does this mean you have a couple of gears under 20" one of which is almost 0?

    Would join the dots be better than smooth curve?

    Posted 11 years ago #
  6. Dave
    Member

    There's a lot of fuzz because, for instance, if you soft pedal or half turn the cranks to corner going downhill (so the cadence sensor registers a cadence but you didn't engage the cassette) that will create a false reading. I didn't try to manicure it too much - although maybe that's a whole follow-up article?

    Bar chart would probably be best, possibly with the points forceably fitted to known gearing.

    For instance, one sample 2x10 drivetrain I just generated figures for gives:

    28,32,36,39,41,42.5,47,52.6,57,59.5,62.5,69,77,81,87.5,119

    Posted 11 years ago #
  7. kaputnik
    Moderator

    Would join the dots be better than smooth curve?

    Is there ever a case when it's not?

    Posted 11 years ago #
  8. wee folding bike
    Member

    Yes, in physics where there is a mathematical function behind the results a smooth curve is justified.

    In biology we would join the dots because we rarely have the same kind of data, it's a bit more subject to random forces.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  9. Cyclingmollie
    Member

    Should it not be a bar chart displaying time spent in each gear?

    Posted 11 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin