CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

Sentient beings

(533 posts)
  • Started 11 years ago by kaputnik
  • Latest reply from nevelbell

No tags yet.


  1. Snowy
    Member

    And was the shed attired in bright colours?

    If not, then honestly, what did it expect?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  2. sallyhinch
    Member

    Shed was neither wearing a helmet nor in hi vis. In fairness, I don't think it was taking primary either.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  3. neddie
    Member

    Gotta watch out for these purple Peugeots. They're a bit deranged:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-28547364

    Posted 10 years ago #
  4. Dangerous
    Member

    Fiesta won't do it again.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-28549079

    Posted 10 years ago #
  5. amir
    Member

    "It is not yet clear how the crash happened"

    Got to be the shop's fault

    Posted 10 years ago #
  6. Snowy
    Member

    This time, I'm pleased to see the shop was attired in bright colours but horrified to see it wasn't wearing a helmet. Clearly an accident waiting to happen and the shop owner needs to take partial responsibility, not the hard pressed motorist.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  7. Dangerous
    Member

    Does this qualify ?

    http://www.marketing-mixtape.com/tag/ford-ka/

    Is that car on a road or a pedestrian precinct ?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  8. Min
    Member

    Yet another one. This time the evil car drove itself into a pub.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-28638543

    Posted 10 years ago #
  9. neddie
    Member

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-29831956

    a car hit another vehicle while joining the A1 from a slip road, which caused it to hit another car...

    ...The third car then hit a van, which spun out of control and into a ditch

    Notice that the police are still using the word 'accident'

    Posted 10 years ago #
  10. kaputnik
    Moderator

    "Car turns on side"

    The car would have been heading into town on the Queensferry Road, and has ended up facing the wrong way and by the looks of it, demolishing some of the pedestrian island.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  11. neddie
    Member

    The car that mounted a pavement in Glasgow and killed...

    ...died after she was struck by a black Vauxhall Astra which mounted the path

    The car struck the pedestrians in Sandbank Street at about 19:40 then made off...

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-30074463

    Utterly despicable the language used in this article.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  12. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    His Fiat Panda went into the back of Mrs Brook's bike.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-30115385

    Amazing what you see when you start reading these things closely. A car and a bicycle in a passive voice impersonal collision.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  13. chdot
    Admin

    Check the photo of CCEers.

    That was a strange day - poignant and effective event.

    http://pedalonparliament.org/cyclist-memorial-installed-at-holyrood

    http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=10741

    Posted 10 years ago #
  14. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Now cars are part of the community.

    "Car reverses into neighbour's house"

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-30113085

    Posted 10 years ago #
  15. amir
    Member

    Heehee

    The BBC did actually own up to a driver being part of the cause and effect in a beautiful line

    "He was driving a Volkswagen Tiguan when he hit a house across the road from his own."

    Posted 10 years ago #
  16. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    It's a sobering thought that this minor shunt has done damage that would take me a whole morning with a sledge hammer. All motorsits should be made to push a car uphill to understand the amount of kinetic energy they're in charge of.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  17. crowriver
    Member

    From the chip wrapper (the whole story, no need for a linky):

    ---

    Bin lorry left hanging off Hawes Pier after crash

    Police are appealing for witnesses after a bin lorry left the road and ended up hanging off Hawes Pier in South Queensferry on Saturday.

    The accident happened around 1.15pm when the refuse lorry crossed the road and came to rest on the pier with one of its front wheels hanging over the edge.

    The driver was taken to hospital but his condition is not known.

    The road was closed following the accident between Hawes Brae and The Loan, resulting in a diversion through Dalmeny.

    ----

    Bit more than just the front wheels!

    Posted 10 years ago #
  18. dougal
    Member

    Killer bin lorry, in fact.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  19. fimm
    Member

    Nasty...
    A bin lorry driver has died after being crushed by his own truck when he tried to stop it rolling out of a car park. The 58-year-old man was pinned against a wall by the lorry in South Queensferry, near Edinburgh, on Saturday afternoon. The vehicle then hit a parked car and mounted a pavement before coming to rest on the edge of Hawes Pier. The man was taken to hospital but later died.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  20. Dangerous
    Member

    Am I the only one thinking that the above 3 posts (plus this one ?) should be removed from this thread ?

    Events have moved on and facts have emerged since Crowriver made his post.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  21. crowriver
    Member

    Yes, that is very nasty, and since the driver has died I would prefer we did not make light of it. It was not at all clear from the initial reports what had taken place.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  22. neddie
    Member

    Why should we conceal the fact that a man has died, and the press just treat it as if it was an 'accident' and it was the lorry itself that caused it?

    The Health & Safety at Work act should apply.

    It's tragic a man has died - doesn't his family deserve a proper investigation? What about all the pedestrians that 'nearly died' (but didn't because by chance they were a few yards away)?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  23. le_soigneur
    Member

    Nothing has been said here that is not already in the public domain, nothing disrespectful.
    The zeal of self-censorship can go too far.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  24. Dangerous
    Member

    @edd1e_h

    The Health and Safety at Work Act will apply.

    Do you have any information why it wouldn't ?

    Any information why his family won't get a proper investigation ?

    Any information to prove that it was not caused by the lorry ?

    Thought not.

    Until an investigation has been completed nobody knows exactly what happened

    Posted 10 years ago #
  25. Dangerous
    Member

    @le_soigneur

    This thread is full of reports of vehicles involved in incidents which according to the press seem to behave like sentient beings.

    In the incident at South Queensferry the now deceased driver was not in the vehicle. See the difference ? The singular press report was accurate. Do you still think it's not disrespectful to include this fatality in this thread ?

    Posted 10 years ago #
  26. le_soigneur
    Member

    I have posted in this thread on modern drive-by-wire vehicles having sentient properties (search) as well as ones due to operator error, and nobody objected when I posted about the state trooper in the Toyota Camry who was the deceased when the car had a UA so he was not at fault.
    A fully loaded 4 ton truck on the steep ramps of the Hawes Inn car park can have the same runaway properties whether actively driven or not. The title of the thread is objective and this incident belongs here. There is no difference, it could be the Toyota Camry story I posted that nobody censored.
    Nobody here is making light of it. It is a public interest story, there are multiple press reports, there is no disrespect of the victim. You can choose to lurk or ignore this thread but there is no reason to impose your decision on everyone else. The admins are quite good at making these judgement calls should it degenerate.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  27. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    We learn more. If the vehicle is actually used as a weapon, it appears to no longer be sentient;

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-30225298

    Posted 10 years ago #
  28. davidsonsdave
    Member

    Bez had an interesting blog on the subject a couple of days ago.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  29. Dangerous
    Member

    @le_soigneur

    A few days have passed and I accept that I may have made a mountain out of a molehill.

    The result for / against removal of the posts was 2 - 2.

    Not decisive either way but as I said I accept that there is no need to remove them.

    I would ask you again to read what I posted as I "asked a question" which is completely different to "zeal for self-censorship" and certainly was not "impose your decision on everyone else" which you seem to accuse me of.

    My point was unlike your US example this was close to home and after the original post events / facts have changed.

    Given the recent Phil Hughes coverage, there is no need to remove the posts unless someone has a valid specific reason.

    Posted 10 years ago #
  30. chdot
    Admin

    "

    Curses, foiled again (@bigwows)
    28/11/2014 10:03
    On an #EdinburghTram which just got skelped by a First bus north of Palmerston Place. Going to be late for work but thankfully no injuries.

    "

    OR

    "

    Jon Clark (@guitarjonnie)
    28/11/2014 10:01
    Tram just bumped into a bus just off Haymarket, now blocking the road #edinburgh #trams

    "

    Posted 9 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin