CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

"The natural shape of the city is a grid, not a tree"

(10 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    "
    Turning the city’s main streets over to the car and withdrawing commercial uses to the secondary streets of the grid – as has happened in cities worldwide, and continues to do so – goes against the grain of historic evolution.

    "

    http://www.timstonor.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/the-importance-of-grids

    Posted 11 years ago #
  2. amir
    Member

    I never really liked grid systems, too many junctions. Unless there are some big pointers (like signs, numbering systems), they can be quite difficult to navigate too.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  3. PS
    Member

    Grids are dull. You need a few crescents and circuses to mix things up a bit. And a medieval-style (human scale) centre always helps.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  4. Morningsider
    Member

    Nonsense - how can a man made enviornment have a "natural shape". In my experience, the best cities are those that take account of local topography, materials, environment, weather and cultural traditions. That could include grids, but usually doesn't.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  5. crowriver
    Member

    "Cities are as natural to humans as beehives to bees".

    Posted 11 years ago #
  6. Morningsider
    Member

    crowriver - I'm not sure where the quote is from, but its also nonsense. Mass urban/city living is a very recent phenomenon, e.g:

    "One hundred years ago, 2 out of every 10 people lived in an urban area. By 1990, less than 40% of the global population lived in a city, but as of 2010, more than half of all people live in an urban area."

    Source, World Health Organisation: http://www.who.int/gho/urban_health/situation_trends/urban_population_growth_text/en/

    Posted 11 years ago #
  7. crowriver
    Member

    And yet, there is evidence showing that what is now Damascus has been in human habitation for more than 11,000 years.

    Perhaps it is just that what we think of as a city, as the urban, has changed over time?

    Posted 11 years ago #
  8. Cyclingmollie
    Member

    Unbuilt Britain (BBC) compared a couple of designs for rebuilding London after the Great Fire. One was a grid, the other a combination of a circus and a star with a grid in the middle, the circus and star connected by two direct roads. Both designs were put into a traffic flow analysis programme and the latter proved to be the most effective at distributing traffic and shortening journeys (by car presumably).

    Posted 11 years ago #
  9. neddie
    Member

    The best cities are the ones that are constrained by natural features I.e. mountains; lakes; rivers etc

    Posted 11 years ago #
  10. AKen
    Member

    Presumably because once you've built as far as the waterside you're forced to stop there and leave a nice view, rather than slapping down a ring-road and a Tesco Extra.

    Posted 11 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin