CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

Seven vehicles involved in A9 crash

(5 posts)
  • Started 11 years ago by crowriver
  • Latest reply from kaputnik

Tags:


  1. crowriver
    Member

    Clearly this must have been caused by an RLJing, headphone wearing cyclist. Oh, it was on a roundabout? Aren't they supposed to be safer?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-24999507

    Posted 11 years ago #
  2. slowcoach
    Member

    "no-one was thought to have been injured in the incident" which supports the theory that roundabouts have lower severities of accidents (for motorists) even though there may be more accidents.
    It also raises the question why this made the news - does it just help the belief that the A9 is a dangerous road which needs improved?

    Posted 11 years ago #
  3. sallyhinch
    Member

    Dangerous to cyclists too http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-24970955

    (seems a child seat - complete with three-year-old - is no protection)

    Posted 11 years ago #
  4. EddieD
    Member

    " does it just help the belief that the A9 is a dangerous road which needs improved"

    I don't think that it's that bit that's scheduled for being improved, but they'll lump all the stats together to show it's danger.

    Posted 11 years ago #
  5. kaputnik
    Moderator

    I don't think a collision on a roundabout could justify dualling another part of it (this is a more northerly section, not the central Perth-Aviemore corridor that is so notorious).

    It might justify lights on the roundabout, although last time there was a pileup on a roundabout in Edinburgh (at Gogar) it was due to ice on the roundabout. Could have been that given how northerly it is.

    Posted 11 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin