CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

Road risk higher among deprived children, says study

(3 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. Kim
    Member

    From the BBC Road risk higher among deprived children, says study, no great surprise there then. Some of the coverage on the radio this morning missed the point by suggesting the difference was due to wealthy driving "Chelsea tractors" and not letting their children on the roads. Whereas the differences are more likely to be due to the speed and volume of traffic in different areas. Places likes Kensington and Chelsea, have lower traffic speed even though the have high volumes of traffic.

    The most sensible comment is tucked away at the end of the piece: "The government needs to make it a priority to make our streets safer for children to get out and about on foot and bicycle, which is good for their health and social development, by making 20mph the default urban limit, and ensuring speed limits are enforced,"

    Posted 13 years ago #
  2. Morningsider
    Member

    While I agree with the broad conclusions of this report, I have to question its methodology. Breaking the UK up into 408 areas of uneven population, geography and travel patterns and then labeling some "deprived" and therefore less safe for child road users is clearly nonsense, e.g. Glasgow City is ranked almost 100 places above Edinburgh City. While both cities have areas of deprivation, Glasgow has a far higher incidence of deprivation than Edinburgh. The report conclusions also obviously ignore the vast differences between areas within these cities.

    I would also question the conclusions associated with "Child casualties by road user type". No attempt has been made to examine distance traveled by mode of transport or how often these modes are used by children. Without this it is impossible to state whether letting a child cycle would be insanely dangerous or perfectly safe.

    Also, it is almost laughable to highlight a gender divide in road accidents for the under threes. Surely a statistical anomoly, unless some parents are really happy to let boys toddle into the middle of dual carriageways.

    Every child deserves safe roads and this requires appropriate speed limits that are properly enforced. Good road safety education (including for parents and especially drivers) and the introduction of a national cycle training scheme for children - which includes on-road training. Rant over - but these broad generalisations really annoy me.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  3. Kirst
    Member


RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin