CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Cycling News

Transport Committee Papers

(168 posts)

  1. chdot
    Admin

    Agenda
    Transport and Environment Committee - Thursday, 7th March, 2024 10.00 am

    https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?MId=6737

    Posted 9 months ago #
  2. chdot
    Admin

  3. chdot
    Admin

    A motion being brought to Transport and Environment Committee today seeks an update on plans previously discussed which would deal with local flooding issues in Inverleith. @VicNicSNP and local MSP @AngusRobertson explained to us what the solution might look like.

    https://twitter.com/EdinReporter/status/1765661418836165041

    Video

    Posted 9 months ago #
  4. chdot
    Admin

    Now available, the whole 5 1/2 hours

    https://edinburgh.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/862229

    Posted 9 months ago #
  5. pringlis
    Member

    Did anyone hear why Councillor Dijkstra-Downie (LibDems) left during the debate on Greenbank to Meadows Quiet Route to be replaced by Clrr Ross, and then returned immediately after? I wonder if she didn't quite agree with the LibDem position and was subbed out?

    Posted 9 months ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

    She’s done it on previous occasions too.

    Posted 9 months ago #
  7. neddie
    Member

    Papers are out for TEC...

    Agenda

    Transport and Environment Committee - Thursday, 15th August, 2024 10.00 am

    https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=136&MId=7239&Ver=4

    Posted 3 months ago #
  8. toomanybikes
    Member

    trialling exempting private hire vehicles in 7/7/7 bus lane trial. Changing 2 variables at once is going to make the trial pointless if you want to see additive impact of longer hours on bus speeds.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  9. neddie
    Member

    Looks like the St James Quarter developers are "trying again" to force through access for vehicles to the front of the 'W' (golden turd) Hotel / St James Square, after it was previously refused at the Oct 2023 committee.

    https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/documents/s73029/7.2%20-%20St%20James%20Quarter%20Introduction%20of%20a%20Traffic%20Regulation%20Order.pdf

    Do they think they can bully the council into submission?

    This is what the square should look like, according to the original developer's submission and mock-up. Note: people using the space:

    Since that decision, somehow the hotel have been allowing vehicles into that area. (How is this legal? What deals were done with council officers behind closed doors?)

    It currently looks like this, a sterile car-dominated space, with no pedestrians "lingering":

    It's a repeat of West Parliament Square all over again, and sets a terrible precedent by allowing cars into one of city's few pedestrian spaces.

    Minutes of the Oct ctte:
    https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/documents/g6733/Printed%20minutes%2012th-Oct-2023%2010.00%20Transport%20and%20Environment%20Committee.pdf?T=1

    Background from Edinburgh Reporter:
    https://theedinburghreporter.co.uk/2023/10/councillors-unanimously-reject-vehicle-access-at-st-james-quarter/

    Posted 3 months ago #
  10. gembo
    Member

    Walked through a few times and is used by taxis Yup. Shame

    Posted 3 months ago #
  11. toomanybikes
    Member

    Also private hire drivers will be horrible to cycle alongside in the bus lanes. I take the lane but know lots won't.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  12. neddie
    Member

  13. neddie
    Member

    TEC just voted 9-2 in favour of not allowing vehicles into the St James Sq pedestrian space. A small win for pedestrians and public realm in the city!

    Now it only remains to be seen how long it will take the hotel to remove all the barriers, planters, security guards and other car-related crap, and convert the space back to one that can be used by people... Or, whether the council will enforce the automatic bollards being set back to the "up" position...

    Posted 3 months ago #
  14. neddie
    Member

    From TEC papers and ctte meeting...

    ...levels of compliance with mandatory training (including cycling awareness training) ... Licensing Training: Taxi and Private Hire Drivers’ which details that compliance was only sitting at 49%

    With Cllr Aston pointing out that Private Hire Cars (PHC) have a higher rate of compliance on completing mandatory training, at 69%.

    Don't know the maths, but that means black cab drivers' compliance is far lower than 49%...

    Strangely, that also tallies with my anecdotal experience of PHC versus taxi driving: I find PHC drivers very cautious and respectful* around me while riding, whereas I've had a few bad interactions with black cab drivers.

    *touching a large piece of wood on that

    Posted 3 months ago #
  15. toomanybikes
    Member

    new definition for the word "mandatory" apparently

    Can't say I find either group consistently great.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  16. chdot
    Admin

    Our thread from #Transport Cttee 15.8.24 #edinwebcast

    Cllr @DrScottArthurMP confirms it's his last Cttee

    He's been an excellent - consensual - chair

    Thread includes:

    #Buslanes 7-7-7 trial without PHCs#StJames retains pedestrian area
    Faster #Meadows-#Canal consultn

    https://x.com/SpokesLothian/status/1824190300761497624

    Posted 3 months ago #
  17. acsimpson
    Member

    I can't find up to date figures of drivers but the chip wrapper suggests twice a many vehicles in the PHC trade. I suspect that taxis have more drivers than PHCs per vehicle though.

    If the figure is 2 to 1 then that makes taxi compliance just 10%. Of course it's possible that each taxi has 3 drivers on average and PHCs only one which would swing things substantially and give taxi drivers a score of just over 40% compliance.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  18. bakky
    Member


RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin