CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Cycling News

Transport Committee Papers (TEC)

(210 posts)
  • Started 11 years ago by HankChief
  • Latest reply from MediumDave

  1. urchaidh
    Member

    Melt of the Meeting Award: Cllr Whyte

    Still laughing at this one.

    (Sorry, my last attempt at this post may have broken the forum, possibly due to the ill advised inclusion of an emoji from @bakky's newsletter.)

    Posted 11 months ago #
  2. gembo
    Member

    @urchaidh, you got time to squander on laughter when you got a CBP t-shirt to deal with?

    Posted 11 months ago #
  3. bakky
    Member

    @urchaidh sometimes I'm just being glib, but that really did seem like the stupidest thing I'd heard for quite a while. And yes - no new-fangled emoji here!

    Posted 11 months ago #
  4. bakky
    Member

    January 2026 TEC Meeting papers and agenda review at edi.bike

    https://edi.bike/articles/2026-01-24-january-transport-committee-agenda/

    Posted 9 months ago #
  5. chdot
    Admin

    Wow

    That’s a (fabulous) piece of work

    Posted 9 months ago #
  6. bakky
    Member

    Palpable relief when I realised Phyllis had done so much narrative work breaking out the visitor levy outcomes and we could just link to it :)

    Posted 9 months ago #
  7. bakky
    Member

    edi.bike: January 2026 Transport & Environment Committee - Our Roundup

    https://edi.bike/articles/2026-01-31-january-transport-committee-roundup/

    Posted 9 months ago #
  8. chdot
    Admin

    Wow

    How do you find the time??

    Posted 9 months ago #
  9. bakky
    Member

    Sneaking it in here and there; taking advantage of the outing/adventure and resting period cadence of life with smallish kids. I bump through it using the webcast chapter markers and speed controls (1.5x for most folk speaking) - having looked at the background of items the week before helps, as does having a bit of a ‘format’ already locked in. Probably four hours total or something like that all in.

    Posted 9 months ago #
  10. chdot
    Admin

    Please keep it up…

    Posted 9 months ago #
  11. gembo
    Member

    Very enjoyable analysis of what is a rather technical bureaucracy.

    Posted 9 months ago #
  12. chdot
    Admin

    “

    3.1.2 To note that Jacobs undertook a study for the Council as part of the SfP Pedestrian Crossing Review which found that pedestrian waiting times at signalised crossings could be reduced substantially – and in some cases by as much as half – without adversely affecting traffic flow, and further note that the Jacobs report contained a number of worked examples where such pedestrian waiting times were successfully implemented.

    “

    https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/documents/s96681/Improved%20signalised%20crossings%20update.pdf?ref=edinburghminute.com

    Posted 7 months ago #
  13. bakky
    Member

    The City of Edinburgh Council’s Transport and Environment Committee (or ‘TEC’) will meet this Thursday, 2nd April at 10am. As usual, we’ve scoured the agenda for cycling and road safety contents, and written up a summary of the agenda.

    Thursday looks to be like a key day for the future of the Greenbank to Meadows quiet route, with a Green group motion [PDF] ensuring the clock can’t simply run out on this vital safe walking, wheeling and cycling corridor in the south of Edinburgh. But there’s as yet no sign of how the Labour administration plan to take this matter in hand.

    https://edi.bike/articles/2026-03-29-april-transport-committee-agenda/

    Posted 7 months ago #
  14. bakky
    Member

  15. neddie
    Member

    .

    Posted 7 months ago #
  16. neddie
    Member

    David Hunter of Living Streets Edinburgh started his deputation by quoting from the introduction to the Council’s Active Travel Plan. Strangely, he managed to miss out the word “cycling” entirely from the “walking, wheeling, cycling” part

    …hmm…

    Posted 7 months ago #
  17. bakky
    Member

    It’s important to be consistent.

    For what it’s worth that was by and large a decent deputation.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  18. chdot
    Admin

    Transport and Environment Committee - Thursday, 18th June, 2026 10.00 am https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=136&MId=7661

    Posted 4 months ago #
  19. bakky
    Member

    Anyone mind if I start covering Glasgow City Council's TEC instead?

    I just think it might be less... stupid

    (sighs and returns to agenda review article)

    Posted 4 months ago #
  20. Frenchy
    Member

    I can suggest some other councils if you want Edinburgh to start seeming sensible by comparison?

    Posted 4 months ago #
  21. bakky
    Member

    Hahaha I'm sure - perhaps I should be counting my blessings.

    A look slash big old moan over the TEC agenda:

    https://edi.bike/articles/2026-06-13-june-transport-committee-agenda/

    Posted 4 months ago #
  22. bakky
    Member

    edi.bike | September 2026 Transport & Environment Committee - Agenda

    https://edi.bike/articles/2026-09-06-september-transport-committee-agenda/

    Posted 2 months ago #
  23. chdot
    Admin

    “

    Powerful deputation from Craiglockhart Parent Council to tomorrow's Transport Committee on road safety, after years of delay and last year's protests on road safety and the need for pedestrian crossings

    “

    https://x.com/livingstreetsed/status/2097757731134283804?

    Posted 1 month ago #
  24. neddie
    Member

    TEC papers are out for the 12th Nov

    https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=136&MId=8123&Ver=4

    City Mobility Plan - 2026 Review to be discussed

    Posted 3 days ago #
  25. chdot
    Admin

  26. chdot
    Admin

    Agenda Transport and Environment Committee - Thursday, 12th November, 2026 10.00 am

    https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=136&MId=8123

    Reports

    https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/mgChooseDocPack.aspx?ID=8123

    Posted 2 days ago #
  27. MediumDave
    Member

    The cycle hangars motion from Cllr Munro (who else) is "interesting".

    Trying to undermine the viability of the cycle hangar scheme by imposing costs on the scheme operator (unecessarily).

    Notable that resurfacing /chip seal has been applied around parked cars before now.

    Posted 2 days ago #
  28. Frenchy
    Member

    There shouldn't be much damage to the road beneath the hangars, right? It's very possible that potholes were present and not fixed before a hangar was installed. But even then, it's unlikely that these potholes are causing any issues?

    Posted 2 days ago #
  29. pringlis
    Member

    I did notice when I walked along Comiston Place that they hadn't resurfaced under the hanger but I quickly dismissed it as a non-issue. As Frenchy says there shouldn't be much damage under them and as there's no vehicle traffic going over that piece of tarmac so they shouldn't deteriorate much further.

    AFAIK these hangers are now permanent, having been added under a TRO, so it'd only be an issue if they were all removed and the space returned to being parking. Which would require repairs anyway to fill the boltholes and in any case shouldn't happen...!

    Posted 2 days ago #
  30. MediumDave
    Member

    Oh indeed. It's a very bad-faith motion. But that's exactly to be expected from Cllr "I-have-no-interest-to-declare" Munro.

    I expect it will go nowhere but #thisisedinburgh

    Posted 2 days ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin