One of the things that irks me about the establishment is this view of science as something inaccessible and difficult.
Is it just me but something that really bugs me on University Challenge is that Paxman expects folk to know the obscurest things about classics and the arts but seems astonished and in awe when someone gets the simplest science question correct?
If one of our pre-eminent political interviewers is
so much in the dark and fails to ask probing questions.
other questions I would love to see in any "scientific" interview
- Which organisations have funded your work? ("Aah Shell- they must be delighted that you have found that fossil fuels don't contribute to climate change")
- Supposing the unthinkable happens and you are wrong in your predictions/recommendations, what is the worst that could happen?
Climate change believer - we make economic savings
Climate change denier - ???