My favourite response is "Why do cyclists need into the station. If they have a bike why do they want a train?"...
My response is the hyperbole posted under "mellifluous bufo".
CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » General Edinburgh
Latest EEN froth
(7 posts)-
Posted 8 years ago #
-
Seems to be loads of pro cycling folk on countering the usual nonsense. I'm shocked!
Posted 8 years ago # -
@skotl, I assume that was a subtler version of your rant. If so it seems to have been lost on most other commenters. Either way it's pretty funny.
Posted 8 years ago # -
Very good 'rant'.
Mind you, I thought the usual anti-everything EEN commenters were bad until I saw the comments on road.cc under Magnatom's 'karma' video last week...
Posted 8 years ago # -
"CYLCERIST" - Love it!
Posted 8 years ago # -
The whole point about cyclists interacting with pedestrians would be minimised by making the south ramp the main access ramp with a rank of cycle racks where the taxi rank used to be.
Posted 8 years ago # -
The whole point about cyclists interacting with pedestrians would be minimised by making the south ramp the main access ramp with a rank of cycle racks where the taxi rank used to be.
Even if you kept the racks where they currently are, south rank access would allow cyclists to get to the racks with the minimum of fuss and conflict.
Posted 8 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
posts
