-taking his partner's car without permission
-driving without a licence and without insurance
-driving while currently banned
-driving while using a mobile phone
£400 fine and a six-month ban....yes, that ought to stop him doing it again.
CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » General Edinburgh
Banned driver caught driving while using mobile
(11 posts)-
Posted 9 years ago #
-
"£400 fine and a six-month ban....yes, that ought to stop him doing it again."
Why did they even bother banning him?
He's already proven he repeatedly drives while banned.
Posted 9 years ago # -
If people drive when they are banned they should be jailed as another ban in not a suitable punishment.
Posted 9 years ago # -
A suggestion I saw was that all driving bans come with a suspended sentence attached. Break the ban and the sentence applies and it's straight off to jail.
Posted 9 years ago # -
The prisons are full enough as it is.
More practical would be higher fines, on a sliding scale depending how many offences you have committed: four in this guy's case!
Posted 9 years ago # -
Drivers caught while banned should have their vehicle confiscated and crushed.
Posted 9 years ago # -
"The prisons are full enough as it is." Absolutely agree.
Sliding scale of fines, mandatory re-training, community service orders, depending on repeat offences and consequences of any single offence. Persistent offenders should be required to resit a driving test with enhanced "North Korean" style re-education (paid for by the offenders).
Posted 9 years ago # -
Maybe forced to wear a dunce's hat like during the Cultural Revolution in 1960s China? ;-)
Posted 9 years ago # -
Yes, jail costs money and causes more problems than it fixes in many cases. Community Service targeted at something relevant relating to road safety... pothole filling? And a driving retest to be carried out by a really sarcastic police driving instructor.
Posted 9 years ago # -
"mandatory re-training"
Why would that work? I'd assume the problem isn't that people don't know it's illegal, the problem is that that they do it anyway because they think it's safe and they don't get caught.
In a similar way, I never really get why people suggest drivers should re-sit the test to stop them parking on double yellow lines, or cyclists should be licensed to stop red light jumping or pavement riding. I doubt that many people are "unaware" of these specific rules, so sitting a test wouldn't make a difference.
Training and testing is of course important because driving as a whole is a complex task, one needs to be able to operate the machine and know a lot of fairly obscure traffic signs etc., but testing only ensures that people know rules, not that they then follow them.
Posted 9 years ago # -
"they do it anyway because they think it's safe and they don't get caught."
Even that isn't true here: he was already banned, which presumably means he's been caught in the past. Some people just DGAF.
Posted 9 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
posts
