I am not normally a fan of posting stuff without comment but in this case I am speechless.
CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!
Four year old sued for bicycle crash (US)
(8 posts)-
Posted 13 years ago #
-
"I am not normally a fan of posting stuff without comment"
I'm sure that's not a dig at me, though I probably do it more than most people on here.
I am conscious that this is a dilemma (for me).
I put stuff up 'for information' and other people to comment on (if they want to).
In some case the "comment" is the fact that I have posted it + (often) the 'tone' of the subject line!
Posted 13 years ago # -
Back on topic -
"
While he noted that the law presumes children under age four are incapable of negligence, "for infants above the age of four, there is no bright line rule
"Wots the bright line rule?
Related to the Brighton Line Rule?
Posted 13 years ago # -
Sounds more like a Mornington (or Morningside) crescent rule to me.
It wasn't a dig at you, sorry.
Posted 13 years ago # -
"It wasn't a dig at you, sorry."
Er, as it wasn't why apologise?
Even if it was, why apologise!
Posted 13 years ago # -
Well if you didn't think it was why defend yourself? :-P
Posted 13 years ago # -
I think I was agreeing that no comment posts were sometimes unsatisfactory.
Posted 13 years ago # -
It is more a sad reflection on the US health care system, or rather the total lack of a universal health care system, that an 87 year old has to sue a 4 year old in order to pay for her treatment. But that is what comes of having a "small state" and a "big society", something some people would like to introduce here.
Posted 13 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
posts
