CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

"Queensferry Crossing project ‘months behind schedule’ "

(805 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. paddyirish
    Member

    @bax, noticed this and thought it bizarre. Impact is pretty huge. Surely stagecoach could have done an amended timetable with some express and some stopping services.

    @rider73- is the speed camera for the road or bikes?

    Posted 7 years ago #
  2. minus six
    Member

    @paddyirish

    you're right, the impact is massive. yet no one cares a jot

    transport scotland under estimate delays by hours, and massage their tweets with purile emojis as if we're all in the same boat

    Posted 7 years ago #
  3. minus six
    Member

    PS lets not forget !!!

    Stagecoach fund the SNP in a massive way via Brian Soutar

    bus regulation or fare integration is not on their agenda

    THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/nicola-sturgeon-put-spot-over-7667194

    Posted 7 years ago #
  4. rider73
    Member

    @bax = for the bikes!!!!! (and pedestrians if they are walking too fast!)

    Posted 7 years ago #
  5. acsimpson
    Member

    I got the bus home from Fife last night as my train was cancelled. I had assumed the buses were using the new link from Echline to the A90 so was surprised to discover they are all going both ways along the A904.

    Stagecoach really are a joke of a bus company, they have a virtual monopoly of Fife to Edinburgh services so any suggestion that the buses don't go where people work or run a poor service is entirely down to them. As you say Bax SNP (amongst others) could do something about it but choose not to.

    I owe Cole-Hamilton a reply to an earlier email on the bridge so think I might bring this to his attention.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  6. crowriver
    Member

    "I might bring this to his attention."

    Might as well make use of knee-jerk opportunism if it's of use to the cause! :-)

    Posted 7 years ago #
  7. rider73
    Member

    so, even though i thought last nights puncture was because i damaged my rim, today i'm not so sure.
    it happened going north after FRB at the rear after going onto the "scraped tarmac section"

    today in the rain i noticed i got slow front puncture after FRB going south by the time i got to the pub at crammond i felt the tyre being squishy , and stopped and replaced it a few mins later - discovering my pump is not working properly - oh the pain!!!!

    2 punctures 2 days.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  8. paddyirish
    Member

    Cyclists finally back on the footpath from Ferrytoll up to FRB. About 40% lovely shiny new tarmac, 40% heading that way but needing the top layer and about 20% unchanged.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  9. acsimpson
    Member

    Selected buses might now be allowed on the FRB, however I'm fairly certain that the private motor vehicle crossing this evening was breaking the rules. I hope they caught them on camera.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  10. minus six
    Member

    buses, taxis "and authorised vehicles" sez the mothafokkin sign

    Posted 7 years ago #
  11. minus six
    Member

    to paraphrase Amey's response to my complaint about their twitter feed's lack of FRB open/shut tweets to cyclists

    the response from their media and comms division is that they are only bothering to auto-retweet Traffic Scotland tweets now, where the bridge(s) happen to be mentioned.

    that's all they are prepared to do on their twitter account now.

    so i pointed out that Traffic Scotland are unashamedly motor-centric and did not tweet about the high winds FRB closure (or reopening) to cyclists earlier this week.

    but apparently this was just down to "simple human error".

    so thats ok then

    Posted 7 years ago #
  12. chdot
    Admin

  13. LivM
    Member

    Saw a "FRB CLOSED TO DOUBLE DECKERS" gantry sign at the weekend. Do they divert them to the QC now with its wind defences or is it still Kincardine? The sign didn't say.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  14. minus six
    Member

    @livd

    i remember the double deckers !

    did ye know that Brinsley Forde of Aswad was in the double deckers ?

    [+] Embed the video | Video DownloadGet the Flash Videos
    .
    special request to the 80s ladbroke grove posse

    Posted 7 years ago #
  15. rider73
    Member

    i see a lot of buses still using the QFC .....

    Posted 7 years ago #
  16. paddyirish
    Member

    aye - hapy to keep FRB quiet.

    The footpath on the N side is just about done, and it looks really good, though too many traffic cones on it when I last went by on Tuesday evening.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  17. panyagua
    Member

    @rider73 - AFAIK the only buses currently using the FRB are the 747 and X55, which are the ones that stop on the slip road at Echline and were previously having to divert there and back from the QC south approach. All other buses are using QC until the surfacing and approach road works on the FRB are complete.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  18. gibbo
    Member

    I crossed the bridge today. Multiple "cyclists dismount" signs.

    I guess it's the way cyclists are meant to cross the Forth, but at the same time, you're not allowed to cycle it.

    Another example of "Schrodinger's Cycling Infrastructure."

    Posted 7 years ago #
  19. paddyirish
    Member

    @gibbo, I guess you paid those signs the attention they deserved?

    Posted 7 years ago #
  20. gibbo
    Member

    I guess you paid those signs the attention they deserved?

    Yep. I even had a worky wave me past one of them. So, clearly, he didn't think much of it, either.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  21. acsimpson
    Member

    I'm not sure what they expect us to do with them. "Dismount and use footpath"

    Without any specific guidance I assume they mean that you are to remount before using the footpath. Otherwise you would become a pedestrian and so the second part of the advice would be irrelevant.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  22. chdot
    Admin

    The current 40 mph speed limit has been in place for driver and worker safety during construction of the bridge and tie-ins with the road network and existing Forth Road Bridge.

    As these works reach their final phases, the limit on the M90 across the Forth can now be safely raised to 50 mph between Scotstoun in the south and Admiralty in the north.

    This follows the first stage of reopening the old bridge for public transport use last month. Scheduled public buses began using the Forth Road Bridge on October 13 and the necessary works to allow other buses, taxis and motorcycles to join them are nearing completion. Finally, full motorway and public transport corridor regulations are expected to come into force later in the year.

    http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/our-region/edinburgh/queensferry-crossing-speed-limit-to-be-raised-on-monday-1-4603953

    Posted 7 years ago #
  23. minus six
    Member

    by their own admittance, the "cyclist must dismount" signage is mitigation should infrastructure flap about in high winds

    they don't want you knocked off your bike by their fences

    but its ok if youre on foot, presumably

    bizarre logic

    Posted 7 years ago #
  24. chdot
    Admin

  25. rider73
    Member

    how long do we think before they re-open the original FRB to other types of traffic than lothian buses/ taxi's because its clear they have spent an awful lot of money on something thats exactly the same as before!

    Posted 7 years ago #
  26. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    @rider73

    Dartfordisation is the obvious end-game. I give it a couple of years.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  27. crowriver
    Member

    "I give it a couple of years."

    I reckon it will happen if there's a change of party in power after 2020 election. Imagine Ruth Davidson as First Minister (shudder).

    Posted 7 years ago #
  28. paddyirish
    Member

    On the bright side, if other users "have" to use the FRB, that means it will have to be maintained and remain open for cyclists.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  29. Snowy
    Member

    I don't use the bridge during the week. Is the volume of buses/taxis/bikes such that it would continue to justify its existence? Otherwise I agree with Crowriver, that sadly a change of political wind will result in it being announced to be too expensive to keep open.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  30. Baldcyclist
    Member

    Indeed, if it essentially costs £10K every time a cyclist goes over it, it won't last long.

    Would be worth seeing those figures after a year of use.

    Posted 7 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin