CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

Meanwhile in Neston

(2 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    "

    The problem, it occurred to me as I rode on to Neston, was that the routes through Chester had not taken cyclists’ needs as their starting point but those of planners charged with finding a use for a troublesome old railway line or for finding a better use for the canal towpath. The attempt to signpost such a route for short-distance journeys seemed to me to misunderstand the way that most people’s short journeys actually work. If going shopping or on some other errand by bike, I will generally need to go to several places, rather than making the kind of clean trip from point A to point B that might be facilitated by a path that takes me entirely off the street network. While I don’t want to ride on a terrifying stretch of high-speed urban road, it’s not, either, a particularly pleasant experience to ride through one of England’s most picturesque, historic cities staring at the featureless grass bank of an old railway cutting.

    "

    https://invisiblevisibleman.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/a-long-ish-ride-confusing-signs-and-why.html

    Posted 8 years ago #
  2. wrighrkuk
    Member

    Thanks for posting this. Although I don't know the situation well, I think this post should be relevant to Edinburgh because there are, inevitably, some people saying the new Rosebank bike path should be put by a railway line, off the main street grid.

    Posted 8 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin