I wish the press, when reporting on planning matters, would put the references in a footnote. It makes looking for the real story much harder.
16/05618/AMC - Granton Harbour redevelopment masterplan - was approved on Thursday
There is a raft of conditions, the most notable of which is (9) the provision of a 5 metre shared use path along Lower Granton Road with pedestrian and cycle priority over side roads.
Reported in the Herald is a 'clash over tram proposals' - rather - it's a footnote saying the approved masterplan doesn't properly consider interactions with the tram route and these concerns should be addressed in future individual planning applications.
Will this masterplan be built, or forgotten to time like most of them? Just need to wait and see...