CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Infrastructure

Crammond Brig chicane

(10 posts)

  1. fimm
    Member

    I'm sure there was a thread about this but I can't find it. There's some discussion about Crammond Brig at the end of this thread which is mostly about the Barnton path and chicane (but I have not read the whole thing).
    Anyway.

    I went through on Sunday and found that the temporary plastic things were nearly blocking the whole path:
    20170423_122649 by f_m_m, on Flickr
    Not much space:
    20170423_122900 by f_m_m, on Flickr

    I had an "interesting" chat with the woman who came out of the house. She said that one of the plastic things had been damaged by vandals:
    20170423_122920 by f_m_m, on Flickr
    She said that there is going to be a permanent barrier there, and that they'd had lots of problems with cyclists going fast down the hill. Which I can sympathise with, because it is a tempting hill to whizz down (not that I do, because I know there's a narrow bridge at the bottom). An then she spoiled her case by saying that "people from the council" had come and done speed checks and clocked cyclists doing "70-80 miles an hour" down the hill. Which is obviously ludicrous (pro cyclists on closed roads get up to about 60mph...). So I said I didn't believe her about that and of course that meant that she thought I didn't believe or sympathise with her about anything (remember I'm with a bike and in lycra). I wish I'd said to her that that sort of hyperbole doesn't help her case at all... The woman also said that there had been "lots" of accidents involving excessive speed on that hill, mostly involving her, her husband or their dog...
    I came back that way; there are some signs on the way down the hill:
    20170423_130341 by f_m_m, on Flickr
    but to be honest, no one is going to slow down (much) for those. To be honest, you are not going to slow down cyclists going past that house by putting a barrier/chicane after the house. You'd slow people by putting a chicane halfway down the hill; but you can't do that because it would stop people driving to the car park at the bottom...

    I bumped the plastic things across so that no one would be tempted to cycle through the gap where the burnt out plastic was.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  2. stiltskin
    Member

    People do speed down the hill, but up to about 25mph I'd guess. Part of the reason why the people living in that house have incidents with cyclists is that they clearly don't believe cyclists should be there. I've seen them just let the dog run out of the front door and cross to the car park opposite.
    The chicane is supposed to be a temporary trial ending last December IIRC. It is certainly getting to be a joke with it being moved on a daily basis. The original gap was ok, but then it started being narrowed (presumably by the dog walkers) so that you virtually had to stop, and then cyclists would open it up again etc. If they need to have a chicane then it needs to be permanent. Cyclists do need to slow down there as it is a shared route, but as with all shared routes, that goes both ways.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  3. davidsonsdave
    Member

    Whilst I do have some sympathy for the people living in that house, there were many houses where I grew up who had front doors which opened directly onto streets which had cars passing completely legally at 30mph.

    The car permanently parked outside the house ensures that the bikes don't pass close to their door and the speeds being quoted are just plain daft.

    It is important to slow for the bridge as there are regularly people pottering around there so I don't have a problem with a chicane if it is installed to at least the cycling by design standards.

    I do take issue that someone has been regularly pushing the temporary barriers closer together and creating accessibility issues. I wouldn't be at all surprised if this childish behaviour has irked someone who commutes past on a daily basis.

    I suspect that a correctly installed chicane is not going to appease the locals.

    Posted 7 years ago #
  4. chdot
    Admin

    "I suspect that a correctly installed chicane is not going to appease the locals."

    You're probably right, but what DO they want??

    Posted 7 years ago #
  5. neddie
    Member

    I'd have thought a good solution would be a wide pavement on each side of the road for pedestrians. The central part of the carriageway only needs to be one car-width wide for bikes and the occasional motor.

    On the bridge itself, people want to linger, take photos, cross over, etc. - this should be shared (with bikes going at <12mph).

    I'm not sure how best to limit bike speeds on the bridge itself. Chicanes would be ugly and spoil the nature of the area.

    Maybe a raised table kind of thing would be ok...

    Posted 7 years ago #
  6. Rob
    Member

    You can agree to the waiver on this segment to see how fast people actually ride down that road. Spoiler warning, it's not 80mph.

    https://www.strava.com/segments/7894373

    Posted 7 years ago #
  7. fimm
    Member

    Rob, that's not the section were are discussing, it is the descent on the other side of Crammond Brig (past the pub). There doesn't appear to be a Strava segment on that section at all (probably a good thing).

    I believe that there have also been complaint about cyclists speeding down the section you link to (Braepark Road): certainly as you come off the bridge and rejoin the road there's a sign warning cyclists that they are on a road with live traffic... probably the locals think that a cyclist taking the lane doesn't think there will be moving cars around, as opposed to the cyclist who is merely trying to stop the driver squashing them into a parked car...

    Posted 7 years ago #
  8. Blueth
    Member

    I always assumed that sign was just a leftover from a Pedal for Scotland as it is just at the end of the closed road section?

    Posted 7 years ago #
  9. Rob
    Member

    @fimm aaah, sorry, didn't recognise that bit from the photo. That section is actually too short to get alone. This is probably the closest: https://www.strava.com/segments/14694554

    Posted 7 years ago #
  10. acsimpson
    Member

    @Blueth, I think you are right. I appeared just before PfS a couple of years ago and wasn't picked up afterwards. It's moved recently to a less obtrusive location.

    Posted 7 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin